Could we use flowing air as a capacitor dielectric?

AI Thread Summary
Using flowing air as a dielectric for capacitors in aircraft energy storage is proposed, with the idea that charging on the ground and utilizing ambient air in flight could eliminate the weight of a traditional dielectric. However, concerns arise about whether the flowing air would lead to significant leakage and discharge, making it impractical. Open-air capacitors have existed, but their effectiveness with flowing air is questioned due to the lack of a stable dielectric constant. Calculations suggest that while significant energy storage might seem possible at large scales, initial estimates were grossly overestimated by neglecting key constants. Overall, the concept faces challenges that may limit its feasibility as a viable energy source.
RGClark
Messages
82
Reaction score
0
I wanted to use air as the dielectric for a capacitor for energy storage for aircraft. My thinking was that we could charge the capacitor on the ground and leave the capicitor open to the flowing air in flight. As long as the density of the flowing air remained the same, the capacitance would stay the same.
Capacitors usually don't offer significant advantages over chemical batteries per weight because you have to consider the weight of the dielectric that must be carried along. This is true even when the dielectric is air that is enclosed and must be carried along. But I thought an open air dielectric wouldn't have this problem as you're just using the surrounding air as the dielectric.
The question is would the flowing air cause the capacitor to discharge?
Would the leakage be unacceptably high in this case?


- Bob Clark
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There are open-air capacitors. Old-style radios used a set of aluminum(I think) plates that would variably mesh in between a set of non-moving plates, with ambient air as the dielectric.
At the time, I think they were called "variable capacitors" and are probably still available today.

But, I don't think that "flowing air" would work well, if at all, because the flowing air would not retain a dielectric constant necessary for a capacitor to work properly But that's just my quess.
 
It'd be an incredibly tiny (read: insignificant) energy source.

- Warren
 
chroot said:
It'd be an incredibly tiny (read: insignificant) energy source.

- Warren


Yeah, you're right. I did a rough calculation that led me to believe I could store significant energy in an air capacitor if the plates and distance between them were at the ten's of meters scale.
Unfortunately I left out the factor 8.85 x 10 ^-12 out of the calculation for capacitance. So my calculation was nearly 10^11 too big!


- Bob Clark :redface:
 
This is from Griffiths' Electrodynamics, 3rd edition, page 352. I am trying to calculate the divergence of the Maxwell stress tensor. The tensor is given as ##T_{ij} =\epsilon_0 (E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} E^2)+\frac 1 {\mu_0}(B_iB_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} B^2)##. To make things easier, I just want to focus on the part with the electrical field, i.e. I want to find the divergence of ##E_{ij}=E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij}E^2##. In matrix form, this tensor should look like this...
Thread 'Applying the Gauss (1835) formula for force between 2 parallel DC currents'
Please can anyone either:- (1) point me to a derivation of the perpendicular force (Fy) between two very long parallel wires carrying steady currents utilising the formula of Gauss for the force F along the line r between 2 charges? Or alternatively (2) point out where I have gone wrong in my method? I am having problems with calculating the direction and magnitude of the force as expected from modern (Biot-Savart-Maxwell-Lorentz) formula. Here is my method and results so far:- This...
Back
Top