UNG
- 43
- 0
Well I thought because,
Q1 = -Q2 = 100nC, then Q2 will just be -100nC
and
Q3 = -Q4 = 200nC, then Q4 will equal -200nC
Thanks for your help
I also have another question I am not too sure about.
(Click on the attachment for question and diagram)
In this next question I am guessing because the length between particle 1 and 2 is 9.00cm that particle 3 will have to be located above the two points giving an equilaterial triangle.
From this we know all the sides will be the same length of 9.00cm with an angle of 60 degrees. However, there is no solid value given for the charge on particle 1 and 2.
Since
Q1 has a charge of +Q
Q2 has a charge of +4.00Q
So does this mean that the above forumula has to be arranged somehow,
for F3,1 and F3,2 ?
Q1 = -Q2 = 100nC, then Q2 will just be -100nC
and
Q3 = -Q4 = 200nC, then Q4 will equal -200nC
Thanks for your help
I also have another question I am not too sure about.
(Click on the attachment for question and diagram)
In this next question I am guessing because the length between particle 1 and 2 is 9.00cm that particle 3 will have to be located above the two points giving an equilaterial triangle.
From this we know all the sides will be the same length of 9.00cm with an angle of 60 degrees. However, there is no solid value given for the charge on particle 1 and 2.
Since
Q1 has a charge of +Q
Q2 has a charge of +4.00Q
So does this mean that the above forumula has to be arranged somehow,
for F3,1 and F3,2 ?