Coulombs Law. Calculate Charge Magnitude and Direction

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves calculating the magnitude and direction of the electrostatic force acting on charge q1 due to two other charges, q2 and q3, arranged in a right-angle triangle configuration. The charges have specified magnitudes, and the distances between them are given in centimeters.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the use of trigonometry to resolve forces into components and calculate the net force on q1. Some express confusion about the direction of the resultant force and how to determine the angle accurately.

Discussion Status

Multiple participants have shared their calculations and approaches, with some confirming similar results. Guidance has been offered regarding the nature of electrostatic forces and the use of trigonometric functions to find angles. There is an ongoing exploration of how to correctly sum the forces and determine the net direction.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working under the constraints of a homework assignment, which may limit the amount of detail they can provide in their solutions. There is also a focus on understanding the underlying principles of electrostatics and vector addition.

AClass
Messages
23
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Three charges are arranged as shown in the diagram below. Their magnitudes are:
q1 = +2.5 x 10^-17 C
q2 = +3.0 x 10^-17 C
q3 = +3.5 x 10^-17 C

(its a right angle triangle, with 50 cm as the hypotenuse, 40 cm as the horizontal, and 30 cm as the vertical)

Figure image: http://img80.imageshack.us/img80/8029/fig.png

Calculate the direction and magnitude of the force acting on q1.

Homework Equations


Fe = kq1q2/r2

The Attempt at a Solution



F(q1q2)= 2.7x10^-23N [Equation above]
F(q1q3)=8.75x10^-23 [Equation above]

I used polar... trig. Do I have to show my work D:? Its hell on text.

The answer i obtained was 1.1x10^-22 N [Up 12 degrees Left] Could someone verify?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
At its heart, this is a pretty straightforward trig problem. I did get the same answer.
 
vertigo said:
At its heart, this is a pretty straightforward trig problem. I did get the same answer.

Thank you for verifying.
 
I'm working on this same problem. I've calculated individual force that q2 and q3 are inflicting on q1, and I've calculated the angles of A, B, and C of the triangle. I know I now have to use trig:

2F = force of q2 on q1
3F = force of q3 on q1

Fnet^2 = (2F)^2 + (3F)^3 - 2(2F)(3F)cos(126.9 degrees)

To get the 126.9 degrees I added corners A and B in the triangle (90 and 36.9, respectively).

Now that gives me the sum of the forces q2 and q3 on q1, but I'm having trouble getting the exact angle that these forces (in summation) are acting on q1. I see the OP has a direction of [UP 12 degrees left].

Am I taking the correct approach? And how can I get the direction?

Thanks
 
Hi saiyaex, welcome to Physics Forums.

The direction is easiest determined by noting that like charges repel and unlike charges attract. Since in this problem all the charges have the same sign, all forces will be repulsive ones. Also keep in mind that electrostatic forces operate along the direction of the line joining the charges involved. So, for example, the force that the charge q2 exerts on q1 will be along the same direction as the hypotenuse, pointing up and to the left.

You might also note that the triangle, with all its dimensions given, allows you to immediately write down the required distances and sine and cosine values! No need to do any trig. So, for example, if the magnitude of the force exerted by q2 on q1 is F (as provided by Coulomb's law using the hypotenuse length as the distance), then the x-component of the force is -F*(40/50), and the y-component is F*(30/50).
 
Thanks gneill,

I just seem to be lost and/or over thinking this. I know the direction caused by the repulsive force of q3 is up. For q2 I broke it up into it's x and y components as you suggested (converting the cm lengths to meters):

x-component: -(2.7 x 10^-23)(0.4/0.5) = -2.6 x 10^-23
y-component: (2.7 x 10^-23)(0.3/0.5) = 1.62 x 10^-23

I'm confused on getting the exact degree to the left that the overall force is causing.
 
Okay. Since you've got the x and y components, I take it that you're looking for a way to calculate an appropriate angle associated with the net force vector?

First add all the like-components; sum up the x-components and sum up the y-components for all the contributing forces.

The usual point of reference is the positive x-axis, with angles measured counterclockwise from there being deemed positive. Taking the vector that you've calculated for the force of q2 on q1 as an example you can do the following:

You can look at your components and determine in which quadrant the vector lies. In this case you've got (scaled for ease of use) x = -2.6 and y = 1.62. So it lies in the 2nd quadrant. If you've got a calculator with an atan2 function you can calculate the angle right from those values. Otherwise you'll have to take a bit of care with the standard trig functions.

Have a look at the attached figure.

You can calculate the angle α using the standard atan function with the absolute values of the x and y components: α = atan(|y|/|x|) = atan(1.62/2.6), then subtract it from π to give θ. Or for the second quadrant you might use acos to calculate it directly from the component values: θ = acos(x/sqrt(x2 + y2)).
 

Attachments

  • Fig1.gif
    Fig1.gif
    1.8 KB · Views: 839
Thank you again gneill. I have now arrived at the same answer as the OP. I was a little confused with the quadrants but I figured it out.
 

Similar threads

Replies
17
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
10K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
9K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
10K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K