Counting electromagnetic modes in a rectangular cavity and boundary conditions

[Coriolis1]

The electric field in a cubical cavity of side length L with perfectly conducting walls
is

E_x = E_1 cos(n_1 x \pi/L) sin(n_2 y \pi/L) sin(n_3 z \pi/L) sin(\omega t)
E_y = E_2 sin(n_1 x \pi/L) cos(n_2 y \pi/L) sin(n_3 z \pi/L) sin(\omega t)
E_z = E_3 sin(n_1 x \pi/L) sin(n_2 y \pi/L) cos(n_3 z \pi/L) sin(\omega t)

with E_1 n_1 + E_2 n_2 + E_3 n_3 = 0.

In counting the number of modes, the counting is restricted to non-negative
values of n_1, n_2 and n_3. Is there a simple way to show that

a) any mode in which one or more of the n_1, n_2 and n_3 are negative, can
be written as a linear combination of the modes that are included in the
counting and

b) the modes that are included in the counting are all independent?

Also, is the perpendicular component of the magnetic field on the surface
of a plane conductor required to be zero? The vanishing electric field in the
conductor only implies that the the time derivative of the perpendicular
component of the magnetic field vanishes.

Thanks!

 

[mfb]

a)
If n₁<0, a transformation
n₁ -> -n₁
E₂ -> -E₂
E₃ -> -E₃
gives the same fields, as you swap two signs in the second and third equation (and none in the first). In the 4th equation, all signs are swapped, therefore the relation holds.
In a similar way, you can restrict n₂ and n₃ to be positive.

b)
Consider the partial derivatives at the origin (x=y=z=0): \del_x E_x = E_1 n_1 \frac{\pi}{L}sin(\omega t).<br /> Each n₁ gives a unique value here. The same can be done with the other components.<br /> <br /> c)<br /> <blockquote data-attributes="" data-quote="" data-source="" class="bbCodeBlock bbCodeBlock--expandable bbCodeBlock--quote js-expandWatch"> <div class="bbCodeBlock-content"> <div class="bbCodeBlock-expandContent js-expandContent "> Also, is the perpendicular component of the magnetic field on the surface<br /> of a plane conductor required to be zero? </div> </div> </blockquote>I would expect that this is not required, but I do not know it. As you have a time-dependent electric field, Maxwell&#039;s equations should give a field somewhere. If the component orthogonal to the surface is 0, it has to be parallel to the conductor surface.