Couple of electromagnetics questions

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating surface charge density and electric displacement field (D) in electrostatics. The surface charge density is derived using the formula σ = -Eo * E, where E is the electric field vector. For a conductor with a surface charge of -20 nC/M², the electric displacement field D is determined to be zero outside the conductor due to the absence of a y-component in the electric field. Additionally, the electric field intensity at the boundary of a conducting sphere in different media is calculated using the surface charge and permittivities of the respective materials.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Gauss' Law in electrostatics
  • Familiarity with electric field (E) and electric displacement field (D) concepts
  • Knowledge of surface charge density calculations
  • Basic principles of conductors in electrostatic equilibrium
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the application of Gauss' Law in different geometries
  • Explore the relationship between electric field and electric displacement field
  • Learn about the behavior of electric fields at material boundaries
  • Investigate the effects of non-uniform surface charge distributions on electric fields
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in electrical engineering, physicists, and anyone studying electrostatics and electromagnetic theory.

formulajoe
Messages
177
Reaction score
0
E = 15 i - 8 k at a point on a conductor surface, what is the surface charge density at that point? assume Eo.

surface charge density is just -Eo*E correct? but i take the magnitude of the electric field and than multiply it by Eo.
am i right?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
How come??What equation did you use...?

Daniel.
 
Gauss' Law

another quick question.

Region y is great than or equal to 2 is occupied by a conductor. If the surface charge on the conductor is -20 nC/M^2, find D just outside the conductor.
Since the surface is y = , than the normal would be in the y direction. and D = Eo*E. but E doesn't have a y component (its the same E from above), so Dn would be 0. Dt is also 0 correct? so overall, D would be 0.
 
if somebody can confirm my answers that would be great. i also have another one i need confirmation on.

A conducting sphere of radius a is half-embedded in a liquid dielectric medium of permittivity E1. The region above the liquid is a gas of permittivity E2. If the total free charge on the sphere is Q, determine the electric field intensity everywhere.

E inside the conductor is zero.

E at boundary with region 1 = (Q/surface area)/E1

E at boundary with region 2 = (Q/surface area)/E2

surface area = 4*pi*a^2

is there sometihng at the boundary between the two materials?
the only E is going to be normal to the sphere, so it would seem to me that the electric field would not be passing the boundary.
 
question 1: Seems correct to me, although the minus-sign is arbitrary (it depends on whether the field points toward or away from the conductor).

question 2: Unreadible

question 3: why do you think the surface charge (Q/surface area) is uniform on the whole sphere?
 
it doesn't not say the surface charge is not uniform. if its not uniform, than i don't see any way to solve it with the information I've been given.

Fixed Question 2

Region y is greater than or equal to 2 is occupied by a conductor. If the surface charge on the conductor is -20 nC/M^2, find D just outside the conductor.
Since the surface is y = 2, than the normal would be purely in the y direction. D = Eo*E. E doesn't have a y component (its the same E from above), so Dnormal would be 0. Dtangential is also 0 correct? so overall, D would be 0.
 
Last edited:
if the surface charge was not uniform, would the electric field be proportional to the permittivity of the medium?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
23
Views
4K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K