Coupled oscillator question

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a coupled oscillators problem where the eigenvalues of the system's matrix are crucial for determining normal frequencies. The confusion arises regarding the representation of the amplitude vector, specifically why the constant factor ##a_1## is omitted in the normalized vector form ##\vec a = (1, 2)##. It is clarified that the relative amplitudes matter more than their absolute values, leading to the conclusion that the ratio ##a_1/a_2## is what is significant. The normalized form simplifies the representation of the oscillation modes, allowing for easier analysis. Understanding these conventions is key to solving coupled oscillator problems effectively.
member 731016
Homework Statement
Please see below
Relevant Equations
##(\vec K - \omega^2\vec M)\vec a = \vec 0##
The problem and solution is,
1713137644763.png

1713137669509.png

However, I am confused how they get ##\vec a = (1, 2)## (I convert from column vector to coordinate form of vector). I got ##\vec a = (a_1, a_2) = (a_1, 2a_1) = a_1(1, 2)## however, why did they eliminate the constant ##a_1##?

Thanks for any help!
 

Attachments

  • 1713137596149.png
    1713137596149.png
    1.7 KB · Views: 49
Physics news on Phys.org
This is a classic coupled oscillators problem. The solution involves finding the eigenvalues of the matrix, that is the values of ##\omega## which will make the determinant of the matrix equal to zero. That part is already done for you and you are given one value of normal frequency equal to ##\omega = \sqrt{\frac k {2m}}## (the other normal frequency is ##\omega = \sqrt{\frac {3k} {2m}}##).
Your job is to find the eigenvector that correspond to the normal frequency given. ##a_1## and ##a2## are amplitudes of, respectively, the first and the second mass and what really matters is not the absolute value of the amplitudes but their relative values. Your answer is correct, the amplitude of the second mass is twice the amplitude of the first mass and, they are moving in the same direction. However, the actual values of the amplitudes can be anything, 0 cm, 10 cm, etc., ##a_1## is not a constant, can be anything.
Incidently, if you were to use the other frequency, you would have found that the masses oscillate out of phase yet, the amplitude of the second mass is also double the first one.
 
  • Love
Likes member 731016
ChiralSuperfields said:
However, I am confused how they get ##\vec a = (1, 2)## (I convert from column vector to coordinate form of vector). I got ##\vec a = (a_1, a_2) = (a_1, 2a_1) = a_1(1, 2)## however, why did they eliminate the constant ##a_1##?
It's the ratio ##a_1/a_2## that counts. The normal modes are conventionally written as normalized column vectors. In this case, one would write $$\mathbf a =\frac{1}{\sqrt{5}}
\begin{pmatrix}1 \\2\end{pmatrix}.$$
 
  • Love
Likes member 731016
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top