Coupling the gauge bosons to the Higgs scalars

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the coupling of gauge bosons to Higgs scalars as described in "An Introduction to Gauge Theories & Modern Particle Physics" by Leader & Predazzi. The key point is the identification of the field that multiplies \(\frac{1}{2}(1+\tau_{3})\) as the massless gauge boson, specifically the photon. The concept of unbroken generators is clarified, indicating that these generators do not alter the Higgs vacuum state, thus remaining massless, while broken generators correspond to massive gauge bosons. This understanding is crucial for grasping the implications of gauge symmetry in particle physics.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of gauge symmetry in Lagrangians
  • Familiarity with SU(2)xU(1) symmetry
  • Knowledge of Higgs mechanism and vacuum expectation value
  • Basic concepts of gauge bosons and their mass properties
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the Higgs mechanism in detail
  • Learn about gauge symmetry and its implications in particle physics
  • Explore the role of broken and unbroken generators in gauge theories
  • Investigate the mathematical formulation of SU(2)xU(1) transformations
USEFUL FOR

Particle physicists, theoretical physicists, and advanced students studying gauge theories and the Higgs mechanism will benefit from this discussion.

QuantumDevil
Messages
29
Reaction score
0
At page 52 of 4th chapter in "An Introduction to gauge theories & modern particle physics" by Leader & Predazzi one can find such statement:

"We must therefore rearrange (4.2.4) so that we can identify the field that multiplies\frac{1}{2}\left(1+\tau_{3}\right) as gauge boson that remains massless i.e. as photon"

But I still don't understand why such field is needed and what it mean that "field multiplies (transformation mentioned above) as gauge massles boson". For me this statement sounds "slangish".

Next question: unbroken generator - what's that? And for what purpose one impose condition(4.2.8)

I will appreciate any kind of advice.
QuantumDevil.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm not familiar with this text, but perhaps the following will help:

It's not really about 'why such a field is needed'; the gauge fields follow from assuming some gauge symmetry in the Lagrangian, and in this case we're considering the Higgs scalar (2 complex components), which naturally admits SU(2)xU(1) symmetry. \frac{1}{2}\left(1+\tau_{3}\right) is a 2-by-2 Hermitian matrix with complex entries, and if you exponentiate it you get a gauge transformation from SU(2)xU(1)... so it's called a generator. It's an unbroken generator, because the gauge transformations it generates do not change the Higgs' vacuum state. In more detail, we can write the Higgs vacuum state as
<br /> v \begin{bmatrix}<br /> 0 \\ 1<br /> \end{bmatrix}<br />
with v a real number (the vacuum expectation value). Note that
\frac{1}{2}\left(1+\tau_{3}\right) = \begin{bmatrix} 1 &amp; 0 \\ 0 &amp; 0 \end{bmatrix}
and hopefully it's clear that why the Higgs' vacuum state is unaffected under these gauge transformations. However, the other generators of SU(2)xU(1) do change the Higgs vacuum state... so these are called broken generators. The broken generators correspond to massive gauge bosons, while the unbroken generators are massless - this comes from the covariant derivative in the Higgs part of the Lagrangian, where only broken generators will couple to the Higgs' nonzero vacuum state.

Best wishes

Dave
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
9K