Crafting Carbon-Based Life Form for Space

  • Thread starter Thread starter hsdrop
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Life Space
AI Thread Summary
Creating a carbon-based life form capable of surviving in the cold vacuum of space faces significant challenges, primarily due to the absence of essential resources like food and air. While hibernation might allow for temporary survival during space travel, true metabolic activity requires a habitable environment with water, energy sources, and necessary elements. The discussion also touches on the theoretical possibility of silicon-based life, although current understanding indicates that all known life is carbon-based, with silicon's chemistry presenting limitations. Future advancements may allow for the development of robotic systems that mimic biological processes, but these would not constitute life forms. The complexities of life and habitability in space remain largely theoretical and constrained by our current knowledge.
hsdrop
Messages
324
Reaction score
114
Would it be possible to craft a carbon based life form throw dna manipulation and selective breeding that could live in the cold vacuum of space??
Also if I posted the thread in the wrong place I'm sorry I didn't know where else to place it.
Once again thank you to anyone that will tack the time to reply to my post.
 
Biology news on Phys.org
About the best you could do is to create one that can merely survive a trip through space, most likely through a suspension of most bodily and cellular functions. Call it hibernation if you'd like. Living in space implies metabolic activity and such. But the problem is that there is neither food nor air in space, so the creature would have nothing to live off of. Even photosynthetic organisms need air and other resources to live.
 
  • Like
Likes rootone, hsdrop and BillTre
Here's a nice review article from a scientific journal on the subject:
Moissl-Eichinger et al. 2016 Venturing into new realms? Microorganisms in space. FEMS Microbiol Rev 40: 722. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/femsre/fuw015
An important concept in space microbiology or astrobiology is ‘habitability’, which is essentially an assessment of whether an environment can support the activity of a given organism, where activity might be maintenance, growth or reproduction. Due to the fact that we have only one example of a life-bearing planet so far, these considerations are restricted to life as we know it, even, if in some theoretical studies a broader approach has been considered (Baross 2006). For an environment in any location on Earth or elsewhere to be habitable, it must have several characteristics. They are:
  • availability of water, at least temporarily in a liquid state,
  • appropriate temperature conditions,
  • availability of an energy source,
  • carbon plus major other elements required by all known life forms (HNOPS) and
  • other elements required by a specific organism as trace elements.
https://academic.oup.com/femsre/article-lookup/doi/10.1093/femsre/fuw015

The article explores the limits of these conditions in known terrestrial organisms both under natural and experimental conditions.

You may also be interested in reading through a previous PF thread on the topic: https://www.physicsforums.com/threa...le-to-earth-bacteria-thriving-on-mars.906191/
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
Likes hsdrop, BillTre, jim mcnamara and 1 other person
Yep, there is no significant amount of carbon in interstellar space, so no organic chemistry can happen.
 
Thank you for the article. I truly do appreciate the passing of info like we do on the forum hear.
rootone said:
Yep, there is no significant amount of carbon in interstellar space, so no organic chemistry can happen.
Does all organic chemistry have to be carbon bass?
I was under the notion that silicon based life might be possible out there some wair or even something that we just have not found yet.
sorry I'm not meaning to put your comet down at all. I'm just one of the individuals that believes that you have to keep an open mind if you are to discover anything new.
 
hsdrop said:
Does all organic chemistry have to be carbon bass?
I was under the notion that silicon based life might be possible out there some wair or even something that we just have not found yet.

The term "organic" has a specific meaning in biology and chemistry, where it means molecules containing carbon. All known examples of life are carbon-based, but it is not known whether life can be based on something other than carbon. See here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Organic_compound

hsdrop said:
sorry I'm not meaning to put your comet down at all. I'm just one of the individuals that believes that you have to keep an open mind if you are to discover anything new.

Open-mindedness has nothing to do with this. It's simply just another example of how terminology differs between laymen and scientists. And also between forum members. :wink:
 
  • Like
Likes hsdrop
hsdrop said:
I was under the notion that silicon based life might be possible
Silicon does have some similar chemistry to carbon but there are no known silicon analogs to anything like DNA.
One very big difference though is that whereas carbon oxides are gases and are soluable in water Silicon oxides are solids (at Earth like temperature) and not soluable,
This means that any silicon based biochemistry would have to evolve not in water, but in something like volcanic lava.
 
  • Like
Likes hsdrop
It could be possible in the future to send a carbon based nanoelectromechanical human-like robot into space that uses mechanical parts that mimic genetic/cellular processes. Both technologies are under study. It would not be considered a life form, as it would be chemically inert. Powering and maintaining it would be much easier to do than for a human in space. Why would we need to do that though?
 
  • Like
Likes hsdrop
Back
Top