Creative Crafting Ideas: Matchstick Crafts, Origami, Twitching & More

[honestrosewater]

As GD becomes crasser and crasser, I long for it to be conquored by a tyranical nun with a ruler.

You speak of crassitude like it's a bad thing.

Has it really gotten that bad? I don't know about you know who, but I can clean up my act.

 

[arildno]

You speak of crassitude like it's a bad thing.

Has it really gotten that bad? I don't know about you know who, but I can clean up my act.

I always clean myself before and after my act, so this can't possibly be a reference to me.

 

[wolram]

I know I've posted this before but I can't find it... Anyway, Deepak Chopra tells it ~ like this: There was a study of the number of tactile contacts made while in a public setting, between mates [married] as a function of culture. Guessing at the actual values here... Couples from India made contact, on the average, about thirty times per hour. Couples from China touched about fifteen times per hour. In the US, it was close to five times every hour. And as for the British couples, we're still waiting!

Brittish couples do not touch in public, only saturday nights
after 2100.

 

[loseyourname]

No, I just remembered seeing it in my dictionary several years ago. I'm reading a bit of it now.

Pascal was sort of the progenitor of Kierkegaard in that way. Though he was a mathematician and keen in the use of reason, he believed that the human mind and its faculties could not apprehend the divine. The mind could never know God, and could neither prove nor disprove His existence. Nonetheless, a person can and should believe. He expanded upon the "heart has its reasons" bit with the well-known Pascal's Wager, turning the acceptance of Catholic doctrine into a cost/benefit analysis of potential rewards and/or punishments in the afterlife.

 

[honestrosewater]

I always clean myself before and after my act, so this can't possibly be a reference to me.

Guilty conscience? No, I was referring to those Brittish couples with Saturday night fever.

 

[honestrosewater]

Pascal was sort of the progenitor of Kierkegaard in that way. Though he was a mathematician and keen in the use of reason, he believed that the human mind and its faculties could not apprehend the divine. The mind could never know God, and could neither prove nor disprove His existence. Nonetheless, a person can and should believe. He expanded upon the "heart has its reasons" bit with the well-known Pascal's Wager, turning the acceptance of Catholic doctrine into a cost/benefit analysis of potential rewards and/or punishments in the afterlife.

I can identify somewhat with his reasoning in the section I'm reading, as I look at the difference between jutice and mercy in a similar way.

 

[wolram]

I think that's a side effect of not having enough sex.

Moonbear you are naughty

And Tsu, I like "Ts", it should be, BRIT--TISH do you not know about our T,
breaks

 

[wolram]

I can identify somewhat with his reasoning in the section I'm reading, as I look at the difference between jutice and mercy in a similar way.

Yep there is a major difference between, Jutice and Mercy

 

[arildno]

I've never been jutticed before; is that nice?

 

[wolram]

I've never been jutticed before; is that nice?

Im not sure, i think it means "wraped in sack cloth", so i guess it is not nice.

 

[wolram]

The sport of Wellie wanging, is not very well known.