Criteria for Following: How Mentors, Science Advisors, Admin Decide

  • Thread starter Thread starter gracy
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
Mentors, science advisors, and admins often follow members based on various criteria, including the potential for meaningful contributions or monitoring for disruptive behavior. The act of following someone allows their posts to appear in a user's news feed, highlighting their activity within the community. Some members, like Bob Enyart, may be followed due to their notoriety or influence, despite limited engagement. The decision to follow is not solely based on likes or message counts but can also stem from personal connections or strategic reasons. Overall, following someone can impact community dynamics by influencing visibility and interactions among members.
gracy
Messages
2,486
Reaction score
83
How you mentors ,science advisors and admin decide who is capable of being followed by you.Because I have seen many mentors and science advisors following newcomers .I was just viewing D H profile than saw he was following BOB ENYART who has only sent 8 messages and with no likes (even D H )has not liked him but follows him.And I was also surprised to see admin following some very inconsistent members(Although he is not following anyone currently ).And there are many more examples.So,basically I wanted to know what are your criteria for following someone.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Why does it matter? More generally, if A chooses to follow B, what difference does that make to C?
 
gracy said:
So,basically I wanted to know what are your criteria for following someone.
When you follow a member their posts are in your news feed and are highlighted in the online list. There can be infinite reasons. In the case of Bob Enyart, he is a fairly known science skeptic with a radio show.
 
gracy said:
And I was also surprised to see admin following some very inconsistent members

That's quite obvious - we have to keep track of those we see as potential troublemakers.
 
  • Like
Likes dlgoff
Borek said:
That's quite obvious - we have to keep track of those we see as potential troublemakers.
Sometimes we just like the guy. I your case, i.e. knowing for "how many years?", likes don't need to be high priority. It wasn't too long I wonder if you were in my list and your weren't, but now are. I'm having a hard time understand what I wrote; hope can get meaning.
 
  • Like
Likes Borek
gracy said:
with no likes (even D H )has not liked him
That's what Facebook does to a person.
 
I want to thank those members who interacted with me a couple of years ago in two Optics Forum threads. They were @Drakkith, @hutchphd, @Gleb1964, and @KAHR-Alpha. I had something I wanted the scientific community to know and slipped a new idea in against the rules. Thank you also to @berkeman for suggesting paths to meet with academia. Anyway, I finally got a paper on the same matter as discussed in those forum threads, the fat lens model, got it peer-reviewed, and IJRAP...
This came up in my job today (UXP). Never thought to raise it here on PF till now. Hyperlinks really should be underlined at all times. PF only underlines them when they are rolled over. Colour alone (especially dark blue/purple) makes it difficult to spot a hyperlink in a large block of text (or even a small one). Not everyone can see perfectly. Even if they don't suffer from colour deficiency, not everyone has the visual acuity to distinguish two very close shades of text. Hover actions...
About 20 years ago, in my mid-30s (and with a BA in economics and a master's in business), I started taking night classes in physics hoping to eventually earn the science degree I'd always wanted but never pursued. I found physics forums and used it to ask questions I was unable to get answered from my textbooks or class lectures. Unfortunately, work and life got in the way and I never got further the freshman courses. Well, here it is 20 years later. I'm in my mid-50s now, and in a...
Back
Top