Criticize my proof (metric topology, Munkres)

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on proving the continuity of the metric function ##d: X \times X \mapsto \mathbb{R}## in a metric space as outlined in Munkres' topology. The proof demonstrates that the set ##A(\textbf{x},\epsilon)## is open in the metric topology, establishing that for any fixed point ##\textbf{x}##, the open ball ##B_d(\textbf{y},d(\textbf{x},\textbf{y})-\epsilon)## lies within ##A(\textbf{x},\epsilon)##. The proof concludes that the preimage of an open interval in ##\mathbb{R}## under the metric function is open in the product space ##X \times X##, confirming the continuity of the metric function.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of metric spaces and their properties
  • Familiarity with open sets in topology
  • Knowledge of the concept of continuity in mathematical analysis
  • Proficiency in using Munkres' "Topology" as a reference
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the concept of open sets in metric spaces using Munkres' "Topology"
  • Learn about the properties of product topologies and their metrics
  • Explore alternative proofs of continuity for metric functions
  • Investigate the implications of continuity in various mathematical contexts
USEFUL FOR

Mathematics students, particularly those studying topology and analysis, as well as educators seeking to deepen their understanding of metric spaces and continuity proofs.

mathmonkey
Messages
33
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Let ##X## be a metric space with metric ##d##. Show that ##d: X \times X \mapsto \mathbb{R}## is continuous.

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution


Please try to poke holes in my proof, and if it is correct, please let me know if there's any more efficient way to do it. Any help would be greatly appreciated! Here is my proof:

First, we show that for any fixed ##\textbf{x}##, the set ##A(\textbf{x},\epsilon)## defined as ##\{\textbf{y}|d(\textbf{x},\textbf{y}) > \epsilon\}## is open in ##X## under its metric topology. Suppose ##\textbf{y} \in A(\textbf{x},\epsilon)##. Then, consider ##B_d(\textbf{y},d(\textbf{x},\textbf{y})-\epsilon)##. We show that this open ball lies entirely in ##A(\textbf{x},\epsilon)##. Suppose ##\textbf{z} \in B_d(\textbf{y},d(\textbf{x},\textbf{y})-\epsilon)##. Then,
d(\textbf{x},\textbf{y}) \leq d(\textbf{x},\textbf{z}) + d(\textbf{y},\textbf{z}) < d(\textbf{x},\textbf{z}) + d(\textbf{x},\textbf{y}) - \epsilon
implies that ##d(\textbf{x},\textbf{z}) > \epsilon##, as desired.

Now we consider the general basis element ##(a,b)## of ##\mathbb{R}##. The set ##d^{-1}(a,b)## may be interpreted as the set of all ##(x,y) \in X \times X## such that their distance is greater than ##a## but less than ##b##. Then, the set,
B = \bigcup _\textbf{x} B_d(\textbf{x}, b)
represents the set of all ##(x,y) \in X \times X## whose distance is less than ##b##. Clearly, this set is open since it is an arbitrary union of open sets. Similarly,
A = \bigcup _\textbf{x} A(\textbf{x}, a)
represents the set of all ##(x,y) \in X \times X## whose distance is greater than ##a##. This set is open, as we have proven above. Then, ##d^{-1}(a,b) = A \cap B##, which is open in ##X \times X##.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Your proof is correct.Another approach for RxR concerns the metric inducing the topology on RXR.
See attached.
for general metric space use appropriate metric.see answer #3.
 

Attachments

  • 001.jpg
    001.jpg
    19.3 KB · Views: 499
Last edited:
metric for the producy topology
 

Attachments

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
7K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K