Simple divergence/Green's theorem question

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the application of the divergence theorem and Green's theorem to evaluate the surface integral of a vector field over a hemisphere defined by the equation $$x^2 + y^2 + z^2 = 9$$. The vector field is given as $$\textbf{V} = \bigg(y, xz, 2z-1\bigg)$$. The user initially calculates the integral over the surface and arrives at $$36\pi$$, while the correct answer is $$27\pi$$. The discrepancy arises from not accounting for the flux through the base of the hemisphere, which contributes $$9\pi$$ to the total flux.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of vector calculus, specifically divergence and surface integrals.
  • Familiarity with Green's theorem and its application in three dimensions.
  • Knowledge of spherical coordinates and their Jacobian transformation.
  • Proficiency in evaluating multiple integrals and interpreting physical significance in vector fields.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the divergence theorem in detail, focusing on its application to vector fields in three dimensions.
  • Learn about Green's theorem and its relationship with surface and volume integrals.
  • Practice converting integrals from Cartesian to spherical coordinates, including Jacobian calculations.
  • Explore examples of flux calculations through various surfaces to solidify understanding of outward flux contributions.
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in mathematics, physics, and engineering who are working with vector calculus, particularly those focusing on the divergence theorem and surface integrals in three-dimensional spaces.

159753x
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
I'm exploring the divergence theorem and Green's theorem, but I seem to be lacking some understanding. I have tried this problem several times, and I am wondering where my mistake is in this method.

The problem:
For one example, I am trying to find the divergence of some vector field from a hemisphere. Let the hemisphere be given by $$x^2 + y^2 + z^2 = 9.$$ Also, the vector field in question is given by $$ \textbf{V} = \bigg(y,\hspace{2mm} xz,\hspace{2mm} 2z-1\bigg) $$
Now, I want to evaluate the integral over the surface:
$$\iint\textbf{V}\cdot\textbf{n}\hspace{2mm}d\sigma$$

Attempt at a solution:
Here is how I try to solve it. I instead use (by Green's theorem, where tau is a volume element) $$\iiint\nabla\cdot\textbf{V}\hspace{2mm}d\tau.$$
Taking the gradient of the the vector field, I get 2 (only the z-hat component of the field will contribute). And since it is a simple hemisphere, I can integrate over the volume in spherical coordinates with the following limits:

$$r \hspace{1mm}\epsilon\hspace{1mm}[0,3]$$
$$\phi \hspace{1mm}\epsilon\hspace{1mm}[0,2\pi]$$
$$\theta \hspace{1mm}\epsilon\hspace{1mm}[0,\pi/2]$$
The Jacobian is standard for going from Cartesian to spherical coordinates: $$r^2 \hspace{1mm}sin(\theta)$$
Lastly, evaluating this integral (and not forgetting to include the gradient of the vector field in the integral), I get $$36\pi$$
The answer given in the text is $$27\pi$$ This is not a hard problem, and I am most certain that my integration and arithmetic is correct. There must be some fundamental step that I am missing.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think I have figured it out. If you consider the outward flux from the bottom of the hemisphere (ie. a disk), then that is equal to 9 Pi. The total flux through the curved surface is then (36 - 9) Pi, or 27 Pi
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
28
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K