Cross section (?) of Great Pyramid from drone footage

  • #1
759
294
Summary:
Is this a 'valid' cross-section ?
Following is a frame carefully chosen from this drone footage. At about 0:29 into the video the drone is directly in front of one of the four faces (if you know Cairo, you will know which one) and moving from left to right. At that point I have paused and 'frame-stepped' till the moment before the drone swings around the right edge of the pyramid. So my question is , does the picture present an accurate cross-sectional view / silhouette of the Great Pyramid ? One obvious concern is that the faint lines one can see (presumably representing one or other particular layer of stonework) on the pyramid face are not quite horizontal.

My plan is to super-impose lines along the pyramid edges and then measure the apex angle as well as the slope angle. And hopefully confirm that the base line along with pyramid edges do indeed accurately constitute an isosceles triangle. Further that if a perpendicular is dropped from the apex, the iso triangle will be divided into two equal Kepler (golden ratio) triangles.

1638091700976.png
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
phinds
Science Advisor
Insights Author
Gold Member
2021 Award
17,374
8,908
if you know Cairo, you will know which one)
And what if we DON'T know Cairo? Why would you expect us to?
 
  • Haha
Likes sophiecentaur
  • #3
759
294
Sorry - I don't expect necessarily and the thought was just an aside since the question I am putting is 'face independent'. (other than that statistically one might like to have similar profiles of all 4 faces)
 
  • #4
BvU
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
14,839
3,969
Draw a side view showing the height of the drone wrt the pyramid. Is it looking down ?
 
  • #5
hutchphd
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
3,974
3,143
You will need to know the exact position of the drone relative to the face. An equilateral triangle will image equilateral only from directly normal to the centroid
 
  • #6
759
294
What I was thinking is that if the drone is placed such that it has a 'side view' of the pyramid then the profile in the pic would be a fair reflection of the cross-section - something like the below. I do not expect it to reflect the exact triangular shape of the face itself. For that the drone would have to point it's camera such that its line of sight is exactly normal to the plane of the slanting face.

The specific frame which I chose is at a single instant in the video when only the 1 face is visible to meet the 'side-on' criterion. I am assuming the camera is pointing (more or less) horizontally but that could be completely wrong.

1638111189575.png
 
Last edited:
  • #7
759
294
Draw a side view showing the height of the drone wrt the pyramid. Is it looking down ?
I can't answer this I'm afraid. I guess to get the frame I am looking for, one would have to ask the drone operator to position the drone about half way up the pyramid and have the camera pointing horizontally such that it's line of sight is normal to whichever stonework layer is at that particular height.
 
  • #8
phinds
Science Advisor
Insights Author
Gold Member
2021 Award
17,374
8,908
What is it you are trying to do? I'm not clear on the POINT of this thread. Is it to determine if the pyramid is symmetrical ? If that it, I would think that has been determined many times over by various students of the pyramid.
 
  • #9
hutchphd
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
3,974
3,143
The issue here is perspective. The nice thing about perspective (without aberration) is that straight lines always map onto straight lines. So if you could somehow locate the two lower back corners you would have a better fit to the center cross-section. Obviously also if the drone is very far away (∞) at base level the elevation you seek and the face will superpose.
 
  • Like
Likes neilparker62
  • #10
759
294
What is it you are trying to do? I'm not clear on the POINT of this thread. Is it to determine if the pyramid is symmetrical ? If that it, I would think that has been determined many times over by various students of the pyramid.
Here is what I'm trying to do. Firstly obtain a 'real-time' measure of relevant angles. Secondly check the Kepler triangle theory. I've constructed the Kepler triangle based on GD being of unit length. It fits like a glove but the caveat is whether I have an authentic cross-section or not. The angles look good in respect of same. I wonder if a much more accurate determination could be made along similar lines.

Construction:

1. M is midpoint of CD which we are taking as the base of the triangle.
2. From M we draw a perpendicular to point I (just off diagram at the top) such that MI = GD
3. Construct J as midpoint of MI and arc MJ down to the horizontal at K.. Join KI which by Pythagoras thm is of length ##\sqrt{5}GD/2##.
4. With K as centre and radius set to KI arc down to base at D showing that ##MD=\phi GD##

1638117130370.png
 
Last edited:
  • #11
759
294
The issue here is perspective. The nice thing about perspective (without aberration) is that straight lines always map onto straight lines. So if you could somehow locate the two lower back corners you would have a better fit to the center cross-section. Obviously also if the drone is very far away (∞) at base level the elevation you seek and the face will superpose.
Yes indeed. I'm not worried about getting the whole triangle right down to base since the shape is the same all the way up. What I need to make sure of is that the drone picture accurately reflects the centre cross-section so we can check if it lines up with following:

1638118500701.png
 
  • #12
759
294
I should indicate that whereas above shows sides ##\Phi,\sqrt{\Phi}## and 1, I have effectively constructed ##1,\sqrt{\phi}, \phi## which is a similar triangle. ##\Phi=\frac{1+\sqrt{5}}{2}## and ##\phi=\frac{\sqrt{5}-1}{2}##
 
  • #13
phinds
Science Advisor
Insights Author
Gold Member
2021 Award
17,374
8,908
Secondly check the Kepler triangle theory.
Why? Do you think that hasn't already been done? I mean, do you expect, with your crude measurement method, to do better than what has already been done or are you just interested in specifically doing it yourself? Do you expect a different result than what has already been done?

EDIT: I see I'm sounding very negative here. Not my intent, I just don't get why you want to do it.
 
  • Like
Likes weirdoguy
  • #14
759
294
My hunch is a well-equipped drone could indeed do a very accurate aerial survey and establish important parameters such as the slope angle with a high degree of accuracy. Has it been done already (?) - seemingly not as far as I can ascertain. Most places I look seem to do nothing much more than quote Flinders Petrie's measurements from the last century. I think he did an excellent job but I'm sure modern technology has a lot more to offer. I can't even find any laser distance and/or angle measurements. You'd think that would be an obvious.

I suspect even my "crude measurement" could be considerably enhanced with high resolution graphics, more sophisticated statistics and techniques for edge detection.
 
  • #15
phinds
Science Advisor
Insights Author
Gold Member
2021 Award
17,374
8,908
I suspect even my "crude measurement" could be considerably enhanced with high resolution graphics, more sophisticated statistics and techniques for edge detection.
Good point.
 
  • #17
759
294
Why? Do you think that hasn't already been done? I mean, do you expect, with your crude measurement method, to do better than what has already been done or are you just interested in specifically doing it yourself? Do you expect a different result than what has already been done?

EDIT: I see I'm sounding very negative here. Not my intent, I just don't get why you want to do it.
No worries.

Ok - can I perhaps rephrase the basic query ?

In principle, should it be possible to obtain an accurate cross-sectional view / silhouette outline of the Great Pyramid by placing a drone right in front of the pyramid holding absolutely steady with camera pointing in a direction normal to the pyramid's cross-section ? So that the view is similar to my graphic (only one face showing) but hopefully not tilted as appears to be the case based on some visible layers of masonry not being quite horizontal.

The reason I ask is because from what research I have done, the various determinations of slope angle are not particularly convincing and it's a key parameter. Accurate silhouette views would also give us a very graphic picture of just how good the builders were. And we will see that if we get such silhouette views in front of each face of the pyramid. Even in my very crude 'measurement' there is enough to show that there is no discernible deviation from 'straight and true' along the lines fitted to the 2 edges shown. And the measured angles are very close to what we expect from a 5/2 seked or rise/run of 14/11.
 
  • #18
A.T.
Science Advisor
11,463
2,828
My hunch is a well-equipped drone could indeed do a very accurate aerial survey ...
I would point laser range finders along the edges, then place a drone with laser reflectors at the apex, where they all intersect.
 
  • Like
Likes neilparker62
  • #19
hutchphd
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
3,974
3,143
With one image you will still need to know the relative position of the camera. For instance, if you know the camera is in the base plane of the pyramid, then you must know its distance from the two nearest corners. Or if it is face centered exactly you need to know its distance from the face.
One method to obtain this data is to include a known target in the image, and infer the absolute camera position from image of the target.

Another useful method is to use stereo views of the pyramid and locate the corners on two images . Better be good at projective geometry. Also you need to know the exact relative orientation of the two camera images.

If you really are trying to obtain precise measurements, a single image by itself will not suffice.
This kind of 3D location is done routinely for athletes and kinesthesiology using stereo imaging. I (my team) once designed and built such a system to locate coordinated medical sensors real time on a patient. For precise location I think laser scanning now is probably state of the art.
Good luck......sounds like fun !
 
  • Like
Likes neilparker62 and BvU
  • #20
35,643
7,519
In principle, should it be possible to obtain an accurate cross-sectional view / silhouette outline of the Great Pyramid by placing a drone right in front of the pyramid holding absolutely steady with camera pointing in a direction normal to the pyramid's cross-section ?
If you mean normal to a horizontal cross section, the drone would need to be stationed directly above the apex of the pyramid. Or did you intend that the drone be placed normal to the altitude (vertical line from base to apex) of the pyramid?
 
  • #21
pbuk
Science Advisor
Gold Member
2,770
1,473
If you really are trying to obtain precise measurements, a single image by itself will not suffice.
If you are really trying to obtain precise measurements then you wouldn't use images at all, you would use a theodolite or similar surveying equipment. Which is what the surveyors that have measured the base length and apex height to greater than 1% accuracy have done (and adjusted for the original limestone facing stones).

Why do you think you can improve on this with measurements from images, even if you did have the necessary information about the position from which the image was taken?
 
  • Like
Likes hutchphd and phinds
  • #22
759
294
If you mean normal to a horizontal cross section, the drone would need to be stationed directly above the apex of the pyramid. Or did you intend that the drone be placed normal to the altitude (vertical line from base to apex) of the pyramid?
Normal to the altitude. In simple terms imagine if somehow one could shine a huge torch on the pyramid and then capture the shadow on an imagined huge screen placed behind. In essence that's what I thought the drone pic would be and the measured slope angle I obtain is 52 degrees. Not very far out from the 51.8 or so which is the commonly accepted value.

Here I try the same idea on a small paper model of the pyramid I have made. Again it is a very crude pic - I can' t get the horizontal alignment right. Also I don't have any method of holding my cellphone vertical. All the same the measured angles are clearly enough cross-section angles - that is angles of the pyramid's sihouette and not of the face itself. So I think that's good enough as "proof of concept". The technical challenge is to implement it with perfect camera alignment. Then you should get a 'perfect silhouette'. Or am I misunderstanding the physics of projection / projective geometry ?

1638365283194.png
 
  • #23
hutchphd
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
3,974
3,143
You are misunderstanding. The method you propose will only be exact if you are infinitely far away. The angle subtended depends upon both the actual spatial separation and the distance to the lens.
 
  • #24
DaveC426913
Gold Member
20,228
3,601
Is there sufficient attention given to the focal length of the drone camera, which will surely be very wide angle?
Doesn't that confound any attempted measurements?
 
  • #25
DaveC426913
Gold Member
20,228
3,601
In principle, should it be possible to obtain an accurate cross-sectional view / silhouette outline of the Great Pyramid by placing a drone right in front of the pyramid holding absolutely steady with camera pointing in a direction normal to the pyramid's cross-section ? So that the view is similar to my graphic (only one face showing) but hopefully not tilted as appears to be the case based on some visible layers of masonry not being quite horizontal.

The reason I ask is because from what research I have done, the various determinations of slope angle are not particularly convincing and it's a key parameter. Accurate silhouette views would also give us a very graphic picture of just how good the builders were. And we will see that if we get such silhouette views in front of each face of the pyramid. Even in my very crude 'measurement' there is enough to show that there is no discernible deviation from 'straight and true' along the lines fitted to the 2 edges shown. And the measured angles are very close to what we expect from a 5/2 seked or rise/run of 14/11.
I see the potential for a kind of 'horse cart before the chicken egg' problem here.

How can you place a drone in exactly the right spot - without using measurements of the pyramid to figure out where that spot is? By the time you've done that, you don't need the drone.
 
  • Like
Likes neilparker62
Top