Another volume by cross section.

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the volume of a solid with a triangular cross-section defined by the lines x + 2y = 4 and x - 2y = 4. The correct approach involves integrating with respect to x, using the area formula for isosceles right triangles. The area of each triangle is derived from the difference between the two lines' y-values, leading to the integral ∫(1/2)(4-x)² dx from 0 to 4. The confusion regarding the angles being π/4 arises from the properties of isosceles right triangles, where the two base angles are equal.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of integration techniques in calculus
  • Familiarity with the properties of isosceles right triangles
  • Knowledge of linear equations and their graphical representations
  • Ability to set up and evaluate definite integrals
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the area formula for isosceles right triangles
  • Learn how to set up integrals for volume calculations of solids with cross-sections
  • Explore the implications of changing variables in integration (e.g., integrating with respect to y vs. x)
  • Review the properties of linear equations and their intersections in the Cartesian plane
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in calculus, mathematicians focusing on geometric applications, and anyone involved in volume calculations of solids with triangular cross-sections.

Call my name
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
The base of a solid is the triangular region bounded by the y-axis and the lines x + 2y = 4, x - 2y =4. Find the volume of the solid given that the cross sections perpendicular to the x-axis are isosceles right triangles with hypotenuse on the xy-plane.

So what I did is:

2\int_{x=0}^2 (4-2y)^2/(\sqrt{2})^2*1/2

I set A(x) = (4-2y)^2/(\sqrt{2})^2*1/2

and it comes from 1/2 * base * height.

I assumed that the other two angles when the hypotenuse is 4-2y to be pi/4. I do not know why it is pi/4. I researched this forum and found out that it is supposed to be like that.

However, the answer is wrong, so what did I do wrong here?
(and why do you assume that the two angles are pi/4 ?)

Thanks for reading, and thank all of you who answered my previous question.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
How in the world did you get that integral? I can see that "4- 2y" is from the line x+ 2y= 4, but why are you not using the other line, x- 2y= 4, which is equivalent to x= 4+2y? And I have no idea how you got that "\sqrt{2}" in there!

Since you are told that the cross sections perpendicular to the x-axis are isosceles right triangles, you need their "thickness" along the x-axis and so should be integrating with respect to x, not y.

The top line is given by y2= 2- (1/2)x and the bottom line by y1= -2+ (1/2)x. One the lengths of the legs of the triangles are given by the difference of those two y, y2-y1, values at each x. The area of such a triangle is, of course (1/2)(y2-y1)2. The volume of each "slab" is that are times the thickness, dx. That is what you integrate.

assumed that the other two angles when the hypotenuse is 4-2y to be pi/4. I do not know why it is pi/4. I researched this forum and found out that it is supposed to be like that.
You were told that the triangles were isosceles right triangles. That means that the two legs are the same length and, therefore, that the two base angles are the same. Since any triangle has angles summing to \pi radians and one angle you know is [math]\pi/2[/itex], that leaves \pi- \pi/2= \pi/2 radians for the other two angles. And since they are the same, each is (\pi/2)/2= \pi/4 radians. Of course, you don't need to know those angles for this problem.
 
Yes. How in the world did I get that equation? That is so wrong... It is so obvious for the isosceles right triangle to have two angles same...

However, according to your answer,
y2-y1 = 4-x &\int_{x=0}^4(1/2)(4-x)^2

This is wrong. (4-x)^2 is supposed to be hypotenuse so the

correct integral is:

\int_{x=0}^4(1/2)(4-x)^2/(\sqrt{2})^2

with A(x) = ((4-x)/\sqrt{2})^2

Thank you.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
20
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
3K