Crystal Thickness for particular phase difference

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the required thickness of a crystal to achieve a 90-degree phase difference between two light waves entering the crystal, one polarized parallel and the other perpendicular to the optic axis. The refractive indices are given as η(1)=1.55 and η(2)=1.54, with both waves having a vacuum wavelength of 589nm. The derived formula for thickness is d=nλ₁=(n+1/4)λ₂, leading to a calculated thickness of approximately 14.7μm. The participants confirm the approach and calculations as correct.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of wave optics and phase difference
  • Knowledge of refractive indices and their implications
  • Familiarity with the concept of polarization of light
  • Basic mathematical skills for manipulating equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the principles of wave optics, focusing on phase differences
  • Learn about the effects of refractive indices on light propagation
  • Explore the concept of polarization and its applications in optics
  • Investigate advanced topics in crystal optics and thickness calculations
USEFUL FOR

Optics students, physicists, and engineers involved in optical design and analysis, particularly those working with polarized light and crystal materials.

Sekonda
Messages
201
Reaction score
0
1. Hey, the question I believe should be fairly simple to solve but it's been a while since I've looked over such content. There are two light waves that enter a crytstal at the same time, one linearly polarised parallel to the optic axis and one perpendicular to the optic axis, they have refractive indices η(1)=1.55 and η(2)=1.54. How thick must the crystal be for the light waves to exit with a 90 degree phase difference?



2. η=c/v



3. Right, so considering they have to have a phase difference of 90 degrees - that corresponds to a difference in quarter of a wavelength, so the amount of wavelengths in the thickness of the crystal must differ by just a quarter more i.e.

d=n\lambda_{1}=(n+\frac{1}{4})\lambda_{2}

Where 'd' is the thickness of the crystal, the number of wavelengths 'n' can be determined from

n=\frac{\frac{1}{4}\lambda_{2}}{\lambda_{1}-\lambda_{2}}=\frac{1}{4}\frac{\lambda_{2}}{\Delta \lambda}=\frac{1}{4}\frac{\eta _{1}}{\Delta\eta}

The last step I think we assume that the frequencies of the waves are the same... I can't remember how the last step is made unless we assume the frequencies of the waves are equal... Anyway, once 'n' is found we can substitute it into the first equation but I'm not sure how I find the final distance... I'll take another look at it.


Thanks SK
 
Physics news on Phys.org
... We are told the wavelengths of the waves (in the vacuum) are both 589nm... Still, is this the correct way to approach the question?

I get an answer of about 14.7μm=d
 
Last edited:
Sekonda said:
... We are told the wavelengths of the waves (in the vacuum) are both 589nm... Still, is this the correct way to approach the question?

I get an answer of about 14.7μm=d

Me too.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
903
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
995
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K