Curie-Weiss Paramagnetism susceptibility

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on Curie-Weiss paramagnetism susceptibility, specifically analyzing the behavior of the spin-1/2 Ising model under an applied magnetic field. The effective field, denoted as ##B_e##, is derived from the Hamiltonian equation, leading to a self-consistency equation that defines the average spin ##\langle \sigma \rangle##. The Curie temperature, ##T_c##, is calculated using the formula ##T_c = \frac{Jz}{4 k_B}##, where ##J## is the exchange interaction and ##z## is the coordination number. A notable issue arises in part (b) regarding the calculation of the coordination number, yielding a non-integer result, which is inconsistent with physical expectations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the spin-1/2 Ising model
  • Familiarity with Hamiltonian mechanics in statistical physics
  • Knowledge of Curie-Weiss law and magnetic susceptibility
  • Basic concepts of thermodynamics, particularly related to temperature and energy
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore the derivation of the Curie-Weiss law in more detail
  • Investigate the implications of non-integer coordination numbers in physical models
  • Learn about the mean-field theory and its applications in magnetism
  • Study the relationship between temperature, magnetic susceptibility, and phase transitions
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, materials scientists, and students studying magnetism and statistical mechanics will benefit from this discussion, particularly those interested in the theoretical underpinnings of magnetic materials and their behaviors under varying conditions.

unscientific
Messages
1,728
Reaction score
13

Homework Statement



(a) Show the curie-weiss behaviour.
(b) Estimate ##\lambda## and ##B_e## and exchange energy.[/B]
2011_B6_Q8.png


Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution



Part(a)
Since even when applied field is zero, ##B_{total} \neq 0## which gives rise to ##M\neq 0##. This is a fundamental property of ferromagnetism.
Consider the spin-1/2 ising model:
H = \sum\limits_{\langle i,j \rangle} J_{ij} \sigma_i \sigma_j - \sum\limits_i g \mu_B \sigma_i \cdot \vec B
H_i = \left( g \mu_B B_{applied} - J \sum\limits_j \sigma_j \right)\sigma_i
We represent the term in the brackets by an effective field ##B_e##:
H_i = \left( g \mu_B B_e \right)\sigma_i
Average spin at site ##i## is given by
\langle \sigma \rangle = -\frac{1}{2} \tanh \left( \frac{\beta g \mu_B B_e}{2}\right)
By the mean-field approach, we assume that ##\langle \sigma \rangle## is the same at all sites, giving:
g \mu_B B_{app} - J z \sigma_j = g \mu_B B_e
where ##z## is the number of nearest neighbours, or coordination number.

This leads to a 'self-consistency' equation
\frac{1}{2}\tanh \left[ \frac{\beta}{2} \left( Jz\langle \sigma\rangle - g\mu_B B \right) \right] = \langle \sigma \rangle
At zero appleid field, Curie temperature is given when gradient = 1, so
\frac{1}{2} \left( \frac{\beta}{2}Jz \right) = 1
T_c = \frac{Jz}{4 k_B}

For the curie-weiss behaviour, we expand for small ##\langle \sigma \rangle##:
\langle \sigma\rangle = \frac{ \frac{\beta}{4}g \mu_B B_{app} }{frac{\beta}{4} Jz - 1}
\langle \sigma\rangle = \frac{\frac{1}{4} \frac{g \mu_B B_{app}}{k_B}}{T-T_c}
M = g n \mu_B \langle \sigma \rangle = \frac{\frac{1}{4} \frac{(g \mu_B)^2 n B_{app}}{k_B}}{T-T_c}
\chi = \mu_0 \frac{\partial M}{\partial B_{app}} = \frac{1}{4} (g\mu_B)^2 \frac{n}{k_B} \frac{1}{T-T_C}

Part(b)
I found the coordination number at ##T = 1024 K## and ##J=1## using
T_c = \frac{Jz}{4 k_B}
It gave ##z = 5.7 \times 10^{-20}## which seems wrong as the number of neighbours should be a whole number..
 
Physics news on Phys.org
bumpp on part (b) - non-integer number of neighbours!
 
bump on (b) - doesn't make sense to have non-integer number of neighbours
 
Bump on - (b) please
 
part (b) - number of neighbours?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 59 ·
2
Replies
59
Views
12K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K