Current calculation of a Y-junction

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving a circuit involving a Y-junction, where the original poster is uncertain about their current calculations and the legibility of their circuit diagram. Participants note that the circuit elements are not clearly identified, complicating the analysis. They suggest typing out equations instead of relying on images, emphasizing the importance of clarity in mathematical expressions using LaTeX. Additionally, there are concerns about the accuracy of the current equation "I0=IA-IB," as it does not account for all currents at the junction. Overall, clearer communication and proper formatting are essential for effective troubleshooting in circuit analysis.
simphysics
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
Find I0 in the following circuit
Relevant Equations
I used the delta-Y conversion
Hello everyone!
I've been trying to solve this circuit but there's something wrong. Firstly, I made a Delta-Y conversion so that1 and zA were in series, and so were z5 and zb. I really don't know if writing "I0=IA-IB" is correct, cause basically I0 is the current that flows between the nodes A and B. Can someone help me, please?
Thank you!
EXERCISE.png
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It is possible that you are getting few answers because the drawing is nearly illegible. Not all of the circuit elements seem to be resistors either. So that scares me away. I can make out (I think) ##Z_1## and ##Z_2## on the left hand side, ##Z_3## in the middle and ##Z_4## and ##Z_5## on the right.

Then in the equivalent Y layout we have some other symbols that I cannot make out.

Type in your equations. Explain what they mean and what justifies them and we can talk.
 
Thank you.
I'll try to reupload the pics.
This is the circuit:
Screenshot_2022-08-25-16-27-41-763.jpeg

I did a delta-Y conversion
Screenshot_2022-08-25-16-27-58-026.jpeg

and the new impedances are:
Screenshot_2022-08-25-16-28-14-984.jpeg

I hope that the rest is pretty legible.
Thank you, again
 
Much more legible, yes. Although the forum guidelines ask that you type in your work rather than import images.
https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/physics-forums-global-guidelines.414380/ said:
Core post content should be typed out and not solely contained in an image, PDF, or other attachment. (Exceptions at Mentor's discretion.) Use images for supporting figures. Use LaTeX to type mathematical expressions and equations. (See: Learn LaTeX for Math Equations)
[emphasis mine]
With the images made legible, I can see that ##Z_1## is an inductor and ##Z_5## is a capacitor. So this is beyond what I am competent to analyze.

I can see that you've transformed to something that might be a taus (##\dot{\tau_A}##, ##\dot{\tau_B}## and ##\dot{\tau_C}##) with bars through the symbols. But those equations would be a lot prettier if rendered in ##\LaTeX##.

See the LaTeX guide that is linked here, in the quote above and which is also linked below the edit window when you respond.
 
simphysics said:
I really don't know if writing "I0=IA-IB" is correct, cause basically I0 is the current that flows between the nodes A and B.
That doesn't seem correct (though I'm no expert). There is a junction between ##Z_A## and ##Z_B## and your equation doesn't take account of the current flowing from the junction into ##Z_C##.

I think you need to find the potentials at points B and C. This gives the potential difference between B and C (##V_{BC} = V_C - V_B##). Then ##I_0 = \frac {V_{BC}}{R_3}##.

Notes

A, B and C are the names of points in the circuit So calling the Y-impedances ##Z_A, Z_B## and ##Z_C## isn't a good idea!. Maybe something like ##Z_P, Z_Q## and ##Z_R## would be better.

Your handwriting is difficult to read. Have some sympathy for whoever is marking your work! (And if they can't read it, you may lose marks.) For posting here, you should use Latex for equations (not that hard) as already noted by @jbriggs444.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top