Undergrad Is the current density operator derived from fundamental considerations?

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the derivation of the current operator, expressed as -δH/δA, and whether it stems from fundamental principles or is merely a definitional construct. The reference to "Many-body quantum theory in condensed matter physics" illustrates how the vector potential A is integrated into the Lagrangian, leading to the Lorentz force through the Euler-Lagrange equations. The relationship between momentum and the vector potential is established via the Legendre transform, resulting in a Hamiltonian that incorporates A. The inquiry seeks clarification on the foundational basis of this relationship, particularly regarding the infinitesimal variation of A and its implications for the Hamiltonian. Overall, the discussion explores the theoretical underpinnings of the current operator in quantum mechanics.
Paul159
Messages
15
Reaction score
4
Hello,

I found this article. In equation (1) the authors wrote that the current operator is given by : ## - \frac{\delta H}{\delta A} ##.
I just would like to know if this relation is a just definition or if it can be derived from more fundamentals considerations ?

Thanks !
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Quoting from "Many-body quantum theory in condensed matter physics" by Bruus and Flensberg:
"In analytical mechanics ##\vec A## enters through the Lagrangian: ##L=\frac{1}{2}mv^2-V+q \vec v \cdot \vec A## since by the Euler-Lagrange equations yields the Lorentz force. But ##\vec p=\frac{\partial L}{\partial \vec v}=m\vec v + q\vec A##, and via a Legendre transform we get ##H(r,p)=\vec p \cdot \vec v - L(r,v)=\frac{1}{2}mv^2+V=\frac{1}{2m}(\vec p - q\vec A)^2 +V##. Considering infinitesimal variation ##\delta \vec A## we get ##\delta H = H(\vec A +\delta \vec A)-H(\vec A)=-q\vec v \cdot \delta \vec A##".
 
  • Like
Likes Paul159 and dRic2
Ok I see thanks !
 
Thread 'Unexpected irregular reflection signal from a high-finesse cavity'
I am observing an irregular, aperiodic noise pattern in the reflection signal of a high-finesse optical cavity (finesse ≈ 20,000). The cavity is normally operated using a standard Pound–Drever–Hall (PDH) locking configuration, where an EOM provides phase modulation. The signals shown in the attached figures were recorded with the modulation turned off. Under these conditions, when scanning the laser frequency across a cavity resonance, I expected to observe a simple reflection dip. Instead...

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K