Current is flow of charge with constant velocity; Why not accelerated?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the behavior of electrons in conductors when a potential difference is applied. Despite the presence of an electric field, free electrons do not accelerate indefinitely; instead, they reach a constant drift velocity due to scattering with lattice vibrations and impurities. The primary mechanism preventing continuous acceleration is the dissipation of energy through these collisions, which maintains thermal equilibrium within the conductor. This phenomenon contrasts with electrons in a vacuum, which can accelerate indefinitely under an electric field.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electric fields and potential difference
  • Knowledge of electron behavior in conductors
  • Familiarity with lattice vibrations and impurities in materials
  • Basic principles of momentum conservation and scattering
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the concept of drift velocity in conductors
  • Learn about the role of lattice vibrations in electrical resistivity
  • Study the differences between electron behavior in conductors and vacuum
  • Explore the principles of phonon interactions in solid-state physics
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, electrical engineers, material scientists, and anyone interested in understanding the dynamics of electron flow in conductive materials.

vkash
Messages
316
Reaction score
1
When a potential difference is applied across a conductor. then a electric field[/color] is formed across it. There are free electrons in conductor which should accelerate because of there is electric field. Since all we know that Force =charge*Electric_field.
But it is not so. Inside a conductor electrons even not able to reach speed of a meter per second. Why it is so?Why not they accelerate?
When this thought come in my mind, firstly i think that there is inelastic collision between the electrons that causes heating of conductors and maintains constant speed of electrons. But collisions between the electrons is elastic and elastic collisions doesn't convert mechanical energy to heat. So finally we can say Center of mass of all the electrons should accelerate but they move with constant speed.
that's all i want to say.
Thanks if you reply.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
What about the mean square velocity of these little devils you talk of?
 
sophiecentaur said:
What about the mean square velocity of these little devils you talk of?
Does not understand
 
Electrons don't just sit there, waiting to be pushed along by an electric field. They are in constant motion, randomly, in all directions with a range of speeds, up to many km/second, depending on the temperature. They behave like a gas.
When a Potential Difference is applied over a length of wire, this huge number of electrons will gain a very small net velocity along the wire (the drift velocity).
For a very short time, after the PD is applied, there will be an initial acceleration until the drift velocity is reached but they will not just get faster and faster on their journey along the wire. The extra kinetic energy of the electrons will be dissipated in passing through the metal lattice- they will not accelerate.
This is different from Electrons in a vacuum, which will accelerate as they are pulled by an electric field. Their final Kinetic Energy being equal to the Potential Difference across which they have been accelerated.
 
vkash said:
When a potential difference is applied across a conductor. then a electric field[/color] is formed across it. There are free electrons in conductor which should accelerate because of there is electric field. Since all we know that Force =charge*Electric_field.
But it is not so. Inside a conductor electrons even not able to reach speed of a meter per second. Why it is so?Why not they accelerate?
When this thought come in my mind, firstly i think that there is inelastic collision between the electrons that causes heating of conductors and maintains constant speed of electrons. But collisions between the electrons is elastic and elastic collisions doesn't convert mechanical energy to heat. So finally we can say Center of mass of all the electrons should accelerate but they move with constant speed.
that's all i want to say.
Thanks if you reply.

You are in principle right in saying that collisions of the electrons (or scattering) dissipates the energy gained in the electric field. However the main factor is scattering on the lattice vibrations and impurities and not electron-electron scattering.
In the simplest model, the resultant drift velocity depends roughly on how much the electrons can be accelerated between two collision (on average).
 
:smile:Thanks to both persons. It's something inside the lattices of resistances.:smile:
 
Last edited:
nasu said:
You are in principle right in saying that collisions of the electrons (or scattering) dissipates the energy gained in the electric field. However the main factor is scattering on the lattice vibrations and impurities and not electron-electron scattering.
In the simplest model, the resultant drift velocity depends roughly on how much the electrons can be accelerated between two collision (on average).
When there is no applied pd the electrons and the lattice will be in thermal equilibrium. An equal amount of energy will go each way. Any net velocity change in the electrons due to an applied E field will go to zero after an 'impact' with the lattice. I'm just trying to square what momentum conservation does here. Where does it 'go'?
 
The conservation of momentum for the inelastic scattering of electrons on lattice includes creation (or annihilation) of lattice oscillations (or phonons according to the usual picture).
It may also include a term that may be associated with the recoil of the lattice as a whole for the so-called "umklap" scattering (which may be the major contribution to electric resistivity).
The resistivity is due to the vibrations of the lattice and not the lattice itself.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K