Current Nuclear Engineer Regulations/Debates

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around current debates and regulations concerning nuclear energy in the U.S., particularly in the aftermath of the Fukushima incident. Topics include the potential for a moratorium on nuclear operations, proposed regulations, and specific issues such as Station Blackout and the Waste Confidence ruling.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Exploratory

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants inquire about the existence of a moratorium on nuclear operations in the U.S. post-Fukushima, with one noting that the NRC has determined U.S. nuclear plants are safe.
  • There is mention of a voluntary moratorium on issuing licenses by the NRC related to the Waste Confidence ruling, pending a revised environmental impact statement.
  • Participants discuss the implications of the moratorium on new licenses and its effects on the nuclear industry, questioning whether it results from lobbying by environmental groups.
  • The topic of Station Blackout and its regulatory implications is highlighted, with references to specific rulemaking documents and strategies.
  • One participant raises a current debate regarding the necessity of additional safety equipment for nuclear plants, referencing a New York Times article about the lobbying against proposed regulations.
  • Questions are posed about the technical aspects of proposed safety measures, such as filters, and the effectiveness of these measures compared to existing protocols.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying degrees of uncertainty regarding the existence of debates about a moratorium and the implications of the Waste Confidence ruling. While some assert that there is no current debate on a moratorium, others seek clarification on ongoing discussions and regulatory actions.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the lack of consensus on the impact of the Waste Confidence ruling and the specifics of the ongoing debates about safety regulations and equipment for nuclear plants.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to those studying nuclear engineering, regulatory affairs, environmental policy, and safety protocols in the nuclear energy sector.

xholicwriter
Messages
76
Reaction score
0
I am looking for reliable and scholarly sources (books, articles, websites, videos, etc) on the following topics:

1. Current (post-Fukushima incident) debates about whether or not a moratorium should exist (in the U.S.)
2. What new regulation are being proposed for the most current debates
3. Most current debates regarding nuclear energy (in the U.S.)

Please help!

Thank you very much,

xholic
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Thank you very much!
 
Astronuc said:
Station Blackout has become a frontstage issue:

Thank you very much, Sir.

I am actually writing a research paper on a debatable topic, and I pick nuclear energy. I have narrowed my focus down to current debates on nuclear energy regulations.

Since I do not know much about the current issues, could you give me a brief description of what is going on?

Could you also provide me the background of the station shutdown issue? I don't really understand the technical terms in the articles.

Thank you,
xholic
 
The NRC regulates through the Code of Federal Regulations and the Regulatory Guides.

Protection against station blackout is just one of many requirements imposed on licensed operators of nuclear power plants.

The specific section is: http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/cfr/part050/part050-0063.html

The NRC also uses various other guidance documents including NUREG-0800, Standard Review Plan for Light Water Reactors.


Here is an overview of how the NRC regulates the nuclear industry.
http://www.nrc.gov/about-nrc/regulatory.html
 
Thank you, Sir.

I would like to ask if there were any current debates about whether or not a moratorium should exist (in the U.S.) ?

Thank you
 
xholicwriter said:
Thank you, Sir.

I would like to ask if there were any current debates about whether or not a moratorium should exist (in the U.S.) ?

Thank you

Currently there is no debate in the NRC or US government that I know of. The post-fukushima task force did reviews of nuclear power in the US and has determined that US nuclear power plants are safe, and that there was no need to suspend US nuclear operations in the US.

The only thing which is sort of under debate has to do with the NRC and the waste confidence ruling. The NRC is voluntarily placing a moratorium on ISSUING licenses (not reviewing or processing requests), until they revise their environmental impact statement as required by the waste confidence ruling last summer. This is only a 2 year moratorium on issuance.
 
Hiddencamper said:
The only thing which is sort of under debate has to do with the NRC and the waste confidence ruling. The NRC is voluntarily placing a moratorium on ISSUING licenses (not reviewing or processing requests), until they revise their environmental impact statement as required by the waste confidence ruling last summer. This is only a 2 year moratorium on issuance.

Thank you very much!

I would like to ask some additional questions.

1. Does it mean that no new licenses will be granted to new and existing nuclear plants? How does it effect the nuclear industry?
2. Did the court give the final ruling (or still debating)? Did it partially result from the lobbying of some environmental interest groups?
3 What is still being debated?
4. Do you know any good online sources regarding the debate?

Truly appreciate your help,
 
  • #10
xholicwriter said:
Thank you very much!

I would like to ask some additional questions.

1. Does it mean that no new licenses will be granted to new and existing nuclear plants? How does it effect the nuclear industry?
2. Did the court give the final ruling (or still debating)? Did it partially result from the lobbying of some environmental interest groups?
3 What is still being debated?
4. Do you know any good online sources regarding the debate?

Truly appreciate your help,

With regards to the waste confidence ruling, there is a suspension on license issuance (not reviews) until the NRC puts together their revised report (est: mid to late 2014). The ruling was made in summer 2012, and a court made the ruling. I don't know if it resulted from lobbying or interest groups, but it doesn't matter because they were not properly in compliance with NEPA. I don't think anything is being debated, I do know the NRC went out for public comments regarding the scope of the revised environmental impact statement.

Sorry I don't have any links available where I'm at now.
 
  • #11
xholicwriter said:
Thank you very much!

I would like to ask some additional questions.

1. Does it mean that no new licenses will be granted to new and existing nuclear plants? How does it effect the nuclear industry?
2. Did the court give the final ruling (or still debating)? Did it partially result from the lobbying of some environmental interest groups?
3 What is still being debated?
4. Do you know any good online sources regarding the debate?

Truly appreciate your help,
The Waste Confidence Issue - http://www.nrc.gov/waste/spent-fuel-storage/wcd.html
http://www.nrc.gov/waste/spent-fuel-storage/wcd/schedule.html

http://www.forbes.com/sites/jamesconca/2012/08/11/nuclear-waste-confidence-nrc-ruling-no-big-deal/

Meanwhile - down in Carlsbad, NM - http://www.forbes.com/sites/christo...town-that-wants-americas-worst-nuclear-waste/

http://www.nrc.gov/reactors/new-reactors.html
 
Last edited:
  • #12
I found a current debate on equipping filter to nuclear plans.

Here are two passages from the article

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/02/27/b...nuclear-safeguards.html?ref=atomicenergy&_r=0

"This was a simulation by Constellation Energy, the owner of the Nine Mile Point plant on Lake Ontario, for the benefit of two of the five members of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. It was part of an intense lobbying campaign against a proposed rule that would require utilities to spend millions of dollars on safety equipment that could reduce the effects of an accident like the Fukushima Daiichi meltdown in Japan two years ago."

“We all desire an ideal solution, but it needs to be an integrated one,” said Maria G. Korsnick, Constellation’s chief nuclear officer. She said that a filter was not as helpful as water in the reactor building that would both cool the fuel and absorb radioactive contaminants."

I would like to ask a few questions
1. What is filter?
2. What is your thought on the issue?
3. Where can I find more information about this?

Thank you
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 52 ·
2
Replies
52
Views
11K
Replies
6
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
6K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
4K
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
14
Views
11K
  • Poll Poll
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
11K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K