Current transformer for coupling noise into a cable

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the use of a 50/5A current transformer (CT) for coupling white noise into communication cables, specifically CAT5 and coaxial cables. Participants conclude that while the CT can inject common mode noise, it is not optimal for high-frequency noise injection due to its design for 50/60Hz power applications. For effective noise injection at frequencies up to 20kHz, a wideband transformer with a suitable core, such as an iron powder or ferrite toroid, is recommended. Practical testing with a signal generator and oscilloscope is advised to evaluate the performance of the CT in this application.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of current transformers (CT) and their applications
  • Knowledge of common mode and differential mode signals
  • Familiarity with noise injection techniques in communication systems
  • Basic skills in using oscilloscopes and signal generators
NEXT STEPS
  • Research wideband current transformers suitable for high-frequency applications
  • Learn about the EN 61000-4-6 standard for conducted common-mode noise testing
  • Explore methods for building custom transformers using ferrite toroids
  • Investigate the effects of common mode noise on RS485 communication systems
USEFUL FOR

Electronics engineers, communication system designers, and technicians involved in noise testing and mitigation in industrial environments.

Nikhil N
Messages
80
Reaction score
2
I want to couple white noise to a communication cable. I am using a 50/5A CT. My idea is to connect the noise in the secondary and to couple that noise into the cable. I want to know will my idea work? Does the CT what I am using will be suitable?
TAPE-INSULATED-CT11-380x300.jpg
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Paul Colby said:
what kind of cable? coax?
Yah coax, I am now using cat5
 
so i expect the answer is no since a balanced cable will link no flux.
 
Paul Colby said:
so i expect the answer is no since a balanced cable will link no flux.
But I have seen people using current probs for BCI(Bulk Current Injection) tests..
 
In cables like CAT5 and coaxial cables the transformer winding will excite the common mode while the cable usually is used for differential mode.
 
What I mean by this is the transformer winding will induce current in the same direction in both inner and outer conductors. This induces 0 volts across the line or no signal.
 
Paul Colby said:
In cables like CAT5 and coaxial cables the transformer winding will excite the common mode while the cable usually is used for differential mode.
Actually I have two devices which are communicating with modbus protocol, I need to analyze the efficiency of the communication under the effect of noise, which are very common in industries. For that I need to inject the noise into the cable either capacitively or inductively. As CT can be easly used I am using that for this purpose
 
Okay, The cable is passed through the winding hole in the device you've shown. Get a scope and a signal source and do a test. If it works you're golden. If not then what I've said holds.
 
  • #10
Paul Colby said:
Okay, The cable is passed through the winding hole in the device you've shown. Get a scope and a signal source and do a test. If it works you're golden. If not then what I've said holds.
Ohk..Thanks
 
  • #11
Of course if one splits the cable conductors and passes only inner (or outer) conductors through the CT then the difference mode would be excited and the signal will be injected. Somehow I expect this is not what you're after.
 
  • #12
Paul Colby said:
Of course if one splits the cable conductors and passes only inner (or outer) conductors through the CT then the difference mode would be excited and the signal will be injected. Somehow I expect this is not what you're after.
Actually in industrial environment the noise/interference will be couple as common to both line, I can not go for differential mode . In fields we have already faced issue of data loss, so I need to know how much is the noise effect on the data loss. I can not perform this now in industrial environment.
 
  • #13
If you need to measure common mode noise then your method will work just fine.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Nikhil N
  • #14
Nikhil N said:
For that I need to inject the noise into the cable either capacitively or inductively. As CT can be easly used I am using that for this purpose
A CT will not be operating as a CT in that application. It will be working more like a voltage transformer with a one turn secondary.

The CT will inject common mode noise onto the bundle of conductors in the cable.

A CT usually has a laminated core that is designed for the bandwidth of the power being measured. You need to use a transformer that will pass the bandwidth of the noise you want to inject. Consider using an iron powder or ferrite toroid.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Nikhil N, Paul Colby and jim hardy
  • #15
Common mode interference gets transformed into differential mode by unbalanced impedance to earth. So an experiment will show how well your CT works on that particular system.

Baluncore is right, for "white noise" you want a wideband current transformer that uses a core suitable for a high frequency .
We used a big one around the neutral of our main generator to listen for 1 mhz noise , evidence of internal arcing.

Search on wideband current transformer turns up several vendors
http://www.lilco.co.uk/ was first on mine

but i'll bet you could make one out of the inductors inside a line filter.
Take apart a dead PC power supply. They're rich with inductors.

old jim
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Paul Colby
  • #16
Noise injectors...

Way back when I started out in professional electronics, our main noise generator was the old Weller soldering irons. Turning them on and off generated wideband noise.

Another version thought up by one of the guys: Get hold of a coarse file and a high voltage capacitor (about 10nF). Put on insulating gloves, connect one mains phase to the file and the other to one lead of the capacitor. Rub the other lead of the capacitor against the file.

I also once found a switching supply with too long leads in the PCB layout. A short-circuited oscilloscope probe detected noise spikes one meter away.
 
  • #17
Nikhil N said:
Yah coax, I am now using cat5
Cat5 is twisted pair, not coax, AFAIK.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category_5_cable

It sounds like you are wanting to do a conducted common-mode noise test similar to the industry standard EN 61000-4-6 test:

http://www.elmac.co.uk/pdfs/PNP_61000-4-6.pdf
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #18
I have used a ferrite RF toroid surrounding a cable to measure common mode RF current. It should work in reverse.The toroid requires a few turns of wire depending on frequency of interest. You can calibrate it using a signal generator or a transmitter. It is possible to split the toroid so it can be placed around a cable, then clipped together. The CT looks to be designed for power frequencies.
 
  • #19
Baluncore said:
A CT will not be operating as a CT in that application. It will be working more like a voltage transformer with a one turn secondary.

The CT will inject common mode noise onto the bundle of conductors in the cable.

A CT usually has a laminated core that is designed for the bandwidth of the power being measured. You need to use a transformer that will pass the bandwidth of the noise you want to inject. Consider using an iron powder or ferrite toroid.
Thanks for the answer, the CT what I have is 50/5A, 50/60Hz. What is mean by 50/60Hz which is written over the CT? Does it mean the bandwidth is 60Hz? My noise will have frequency upto 20KHz, in that case will this transformer works?
 
  • #20
Nikhil N said:
Does it mean the bandwidth is 60Hz? My noise will have frequency upto 20KHz, in that case will this transformer works?
Your CT has a steel laminate core that is designed to work on a 50/60 Hz power supply. It will probably work only up to the 5th harmonic at 300 Hz. You will need to find a core that is designed to work at 20 kHz and build your own transformer. Find one in a switching power supply or the horizontal output transformer of an old CRT TV.

If the ends of the cable are transformer coupled you should inject a common mode voltage difference into the bundle. The turns ratio of the voltage transformer will depend on your signal source and the voltage you want to induce. You may gain an advantage by putting more than one pass of your cable through the transformer.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Nikhil N
  • #21
Nikhil N said:
Thanks for the answer, the CT what I have is 50/5A, 50/60Hz. What is mean by 50/60Hz which is written over the CT? Does it mean the bandwidth is 60Hz? My noise will have frequency upto 20KHz, in that case will this transformer works?
My experiments were much higher in frequency but used a ferrite for that frequency. I think you could try the CT under known conditions and see if it is working. Put the CT on a length of wire forming a big loop, and connect this loop to a scope. Connect a signal generator to the CT coil and see if you have transformer action happening.
 
  • #22
Thank you, Baluncore, for practical information.
 
  • #23
Baluncore said:
Your CT has a steel laminate core that is designed to work on a 50/60 Hz power supply. It will probably work only up to the 5th harmonic at 300 Hz. You will need to find a core that is designed to work at 20 kHz and build your own transformer. Find one in a switching power supply or the horizontal output transformer of an old CRT TV.

If the ends of the cable are transformer coupled you should inject a common mode voltage difference into the bundle. The turns ratio of the voltage transformer will depend on your signal source and the voltage you want to induce. You may gain an advantage by putting more than one pass of your cable through the transformer.
If I am operating with the CT with noise upto 20KHz, will it cause heating problem ? Other than heating problem will it cause any problem?
 
  • #24
Nikhil N said:
If I am operating with the CT with noise up to 20KHz, will it cause heating problem ?
With the old CT you will have trouble with voltages over about 1 volt. There will not be problems if you use the right core material and turns ratio.

At the moment we do not know what you mean by noise, or what V RMS amplitude it has.
 
  • #25
Baluncore said:
Your CT has a steel laminate core that is designed to work on a 50/60 Hz power supply. It will probably work only up to the 5th harmonic at 300 Hz. You will need to find a core that is designed to work at 20 kHz and build your own transformer. Find one in a switching power supply or the horizontal output transformer of an old CRT TV.

If the ends of the cable are transformer coupled you should inject a common mode voltage difference into the bundle. The turns ratio of the voltage transformer will depend on your signal source and the voltage you want to induce. You may gain an advantage by putting more than one pass of your cable through the transformer.
Does In the second paragraph what you have suggested mean by the following diagram?
vtrans.png
 
  • #26
The noise injected there is differential noise, not common mode noise. I would want to know why only slave 4 is isolated with a voltage transformer.
If you inject a current into the bundle then you must ask where the induced currents will go. You need a return circuit for current.
Earth or ground is not everywhere the same voltage. There can be big differences in voltage between different sites.
 
  • #27
vtrans2.png


Modified to inject a common mode voltage.
 
  • #28
Baluncore said:
View attachment 112743

Modified to inject a common mode voltage.
Thanks for the modified circuit , Can you please suggest me the type of voltage transformer too with its ratings, if noise is of 10V (max peak-peak), Bandwidth - 100MHz ?
 
  • #29
Baluncore said:
View attachment 112743

Modified to inject a common mode voltage.
It's unclear to me that this modification does as advertised. Wouldn't an ideal center tapped transformer generate no flux in the core if the master line is balanced. Ideally this will not inject either a differential or common mode signal in slave 4. The transformers I've wound on toroids of this type tested at 90dB of isolation.
 
  • #30
Paul Colby said:
It's unclear to me that this modification does as advertised. Wouldn't an ideal center tapped transformer generate no flux in the core if the master line is balanced. Ideally this will not inject either a differential or common mode signal in slave 4. The transformers I've wound on toroids of this type tested at 90dB of isolation.
what you have said is correct, if the line is balanced it won't generate flux . That means, we should go for a toroid type transformer right? Can you suggest me how can I make a toroid by myself for my purspose? (Noise used is of 10V(max), 100MHz(B.W.))
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
943
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K