Curvature of space and spacetime

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the distinctions between the curvature of space and spacetime as described by general relativity. It establishes that light follows a straight path in pseudo-Riemannian geometry, contradicting the notion of curvature when viewed through Euclidean geometry. Key points include the measurement of curvature through triangle angles and circle circumferences, and the assertion that spacetime is inherently four-dimensional, with time behaving differently than spatial dimensions. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding these concepts to grasp the implications of general relativity.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of general relativity principles
  • Familiarity with pseudo-Riemannian geometry
  • Basic knowledge of Euclidean geometry
  • Concept of the relativity of simultaneity
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of pseudo-Riemannian geometry in physics
  • Explore the concept of curvature in general relativity
  • Learn about the relativity of simultaneity and its effects on measurements
  • Read "Relativity Visualized" by Lewis Carroll Epstein for intuitive understanding
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, students of theoretical physics, and anyone interested in the foundational concepts of spacetime and general relativity.

gpran
Messages
20
Reaction score
1
General relativity suggests that path of light is curved around sun. This curvature is not dependent upon frequency of the photon.
What is the physical difference between 'curvature of space' and 'curvature of space-time' ? We can make measurements at two points in space at same time. But there will be some time difference between two points in space-time. Will this time difference be equal to R/c ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Actually, the path is NOT curved when properly described. It travels in a straight line in the geometry that described space-time (pseudo-riemann Geometry). It is only when we try to force-fit Euclidean geometry onto space time that we then talk about it being curved.
 
Thanks. Does the pseudo-reimann geometry represent the space-time space and the euclidean geometry represent the ordinary space? Then does it also mean that two points in spacetime are related by R/c?
 
gpran said:
Thanks. Does the pseudo-reimann geometry represent the space-time space and the euclidean geometry represent the ordinary space?
I don't know how to answer that. Euclidean geometry works fine as a representation of small-scale issues like building bridges, just as does Newtonian gravity.

[quote\Then does it also mean that two points in spacetime are related by R/c?[/QUOTE]I don't know what you are asking.
 
Basically trying to understand the physical concept of spacetime. Just trying to visualise the difference between two locations in ordinary space and spacetime geometry.
 
What you call "ordinary space" does not exist. The only thing that really exists is the Riemannian geometry, which is curved. The curvature can be detected and measured within the Riemannian Geometry without reference to any Euclidean geometry world. Some simple ways that curvature can be detected and measured are by measuring that the angles of a triangle do not add up to 180 or that the circumference of a circle is not 2πr. So without looking at any other geometry, we can see the effects of General Relativity in the Universe. In particular, the exact orbit of Mercury makes sense with GR.
 
Thanks.
 
You can try to visualize GR within Euclidean space. A book I like for casual understanding is Relativity Visualized by Lewis Carroll Epstein. But you can not take that approach very far. Really deep understanding requires another approach.
 
Spacetime is a four dimensional entity. How you choose to split it into "space" and "time" is up to you. Just like in ordinary Euclidean three dimensional space you just pick an x direction, a y direction and a z direction you can just pick four directions. The unusual thing about pseudo-Riemannian geometry is that one of the directions has a different behaviour from the others, and you'd be smart to call this a time-like direction - but there are still infinitely many ways of choosing your four directions. Incidentally, this means that you cannot "make measurements at two points in space at same time" in any non-arbitrary sense, since "time" in this sense is just a direction you picked.

You can always choose four directions and build a small set of axes (three rods and a clock). You can always do it twice, at slightly different places, and then ensure that they are oriented in the same directions in some sense. And you can always extend your rods and keep your clocks ticking. If the rods are the same perpendicular distance apart always and the clocks always tick at the same rate then you have flat spacetime. If either condition is violated then you have curved spacetime. You always get the latter if you measure carefully enough.
 
  • #10
Kindly guide me if there is any time difference between two points on this triangle? What is the time difference between two points on time space?
 
  • #11
I am really trying to understand: "You can always choose four directions and build a small set of axes (three rods and a clock). You can always do it twice, at slightly different places, and then ensure that they are oriented in the same directions in some sense. And you can always extend your rods and keep your clocks ticking. If the rods are the same perpendicular distance apart always and the clocks always tick at the same rate then you have flat spacetime. If either condition is violated then you have curved spacetime. You always get the latter if you measure carefully enough".But wonder if in 4 dimension space, we can define separation between two points in terms of exact values of distance and time.
Also it may be difficult to define two simultaneously occurring events if such events occur at different locations.
 
  • #12
gpran said:
Kindly guide me if there is any time difference between two points on this triangle? What is the time difference between two points on time space?
Your questions are like asking "is there a difference in the z coordinates of the corners of a triangle". It depends on the triangle's orientation with respect to your coordinate system.
gpran said:
But wonder if in 4 dimension space, we can define separation between two points in terms of exact values of distance and time.
Of course. But only in an arbitrary way, just as the x,y,z separation of two points in Euclidean space is arbitrary.
gpran said:
Also it may be difficult to define two simultaneously occurring events if such events occur at different locations.
Again, it's easy to define it, but there is no absolute answer to whether two events are simultaneous or not. Google for "relativity of simultaneity".
 
  • #13
Thanks for your reply. The space- time has properties which are very different from our normal understanding of ordinary space. This discussion was very useful in getting some idea about it.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 58 ·
2
Replies
58
Views
4K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
3K
  • · Replies 52 ·
2
Replies
52
Views
7K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
2K
  • · Replies 62 ·
3
Replies
62
Views
6K