Curved spacetime is described by a manifold

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter pensano
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Manifold Spacetime
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the nature of units in the context of curved spacetime as described by a manifold in general relativity. Participants explore whether manifold coordinates can carry physical units like meters and seconds, and how these relate to the metric components and velocity in a geometric framework.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants assert that the metric contains all the necessary machinery for measuring distances and angles, suggesting that the choice of unit system affects the metric components, while the manifold itself does not involve distance.
  • Others question the implications of expressing velocity in geometric units, noting that while a velocity may appear dimensionless in certain contexts, its magnitude does carry units.
  • A participant clarifies that the 4-velocity has units that depend on the choice of units for the 4-vector components, indicating that the time component has units of time and space components have units of distance.
  • Another participant seeks to clarify the units associated with various quantities, including the coordinates, parameter, metric, and magnitude of velocity, while expressing uncertainty about the implications of these choices.
  • Some participants propose that the magnitude of velocity should be unitless to maintain consistency in equations involving proper time, while others challenge this view by referencing the Lorentz interval and its units.
  • There is a discussion about whether associating units like seconds and meters to manifold coordinates would be acceptable in the mathematical framework.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on whether manifold coordinates can carry physical units and how these units interact with the metric and velocity. The discussion remains unresolved, with multiple competing perspectives presented.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the dependence of units on the chosen framework, with some suggesting that certain components may be dimensionless while others carry physical units. There is also mention of the need for consistency across equations involving proper time and velocity.

pensano
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
In general relativity, curved spacetime is described by a manifold and a metric or frame on top of it.

Can the manifold coordinates carry units of, say, meters and seconds, or do the metric components have those units?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
All of the "machinery" for measuring distances and angles is "built into" the metric, so the unit system you choose affects the components of the metric. The manifold itself involves no notion of distance.

If you choose different unit systems, you're effectively just applying a linear transformation to the metric.

- Warren
 
Last edited:
So... a velocity has no units?

But the maginitude of a velocity does?
 
pensano said:
So... a velocity has no units?

But the maginitude of a velocity does?

A velocity has no units when it is expressed in geometric units. This is the simplest choice. However, as chroot indicated, it is a choice.

If you chose to, you can chose to use 4-vectors with standard units.

If you do chose standard units, 4 vectors have units of

(time, space, space, space)

i.e. the "time" component of the 4 vector has units of time, and the "space" component has units of distance.

Since a 4-velocity is the rate of change of time of a 4-vector with respect to proper time, its unit are just (1/time) * (units of 4-vector). Thus a 4-velocity has units of

(dimensionless, velocity, velocity, velocity)'

The magnitude of a 4-vector will be a velocity - for example, calling the components of the 4-vector (x0,x1,x2,x3) we see that the magnitude in Minkowski space is

sqrt(c^2*dimensionless^2 - velocity^2 - velocity^2 - velocity^2)

this generalizes to higher dimensional spaces.
 
Let me clarify my question.

So, say you're on a part of the manifold covered by a chart with coordinates [tex]x^i[/tex]. And there's some path, [tex]x^i(\tau)[/tex], through that chart, parametrized by [tex]\tau[/tex]. The velocity components along the path are
[tex]v^i = \frac{d x^i}{d \tau}[/tex]
And the magnitude of the velocity is
[tex]|v| = \sqrt{v^i v^j g_{ij}}[/tex]

My question is: what units, such as meters and seconds, can be associated with these quantities? (Presuming I choose not to set c=1 or G=1)

Can the coordinates have units, such as [tex][x^0]=s,[x^1]=m[/tex]?

If not, does the parameter have units, [tex][\tau]=s[/tex]?

How about the metric, [tex][g_{ij}]=?[/tex]

And what're the units of [tex]|v|[/tex]?

It's fine with me if some components have no units, like [tex][v^0]=1[/tex] and [tex][v^1]=m/s[/tex] (as pervect is suggesting?) but then, for consistency, don't the coordinants need units?

Is chroot suggesting that only the metric should have units?

(I'm not sure if this tex will work, but I'm giving it a try)
 
Last edited:
I guess my notation wasn't clear.

The 4-vector [itex]x^i[/itex] has units of time when x=0, and units of space when x > 0. Assuming that the ordering is the usual ordering.

The 4-velocity, [tex]v^i = \frac{d x^i}{d \tau}[/tex], is dimensionless when x=0, and has units of velocity when i>0.

The magnitude of the 4 velocity is a velocity, and all its terms must have units of a velocity. Thus one can infer that [itex]g_{00}[/itex], for instance, must have units of of a velocity, while [itex]g_{11}[/itex], for instance, must be dimensionless.
 
So it's OK then to associate units, like seconds and meters, to the coordinates of a manifold?

That won't freak out the mathematicians?
 
pervect, if the magnitude of the velocity is [tex][|v|]=\frac{m}{s}[/tex] then when you integrate to get the proper time elapsed along the path
[tex]\Delta \tau = \int d\tau |v|[/tex]
you'll get [tex][\Delta \tau]=m[/tex]. But it should be [tex]s[/tex], so I think the maginitude of velocity needs to be unitless, yes?
 
And if [tex]\tau[/tex] is the proper time along a path, doesn't [tex]|v|=1[/tex]?
 
  • #10
The Lorentz interval

[tex] ds^2 = c dt^2 - dx^2 - dy^2 - dz^2[/tex]

has units of distance. To convert it to units of time, you need to divide the above by 'c'.

See for instance

http://farside.ph.utexas.edu/teaching/jk1/lectures/node14.html

This can be re-written to give

[tex]d\tau = \sqrt{1-(\frac{v}{c})^2} \, dt[/tex]

where v is the magnitude of the 3 velocity (NOT the magnitude of the 4-velocity, which is always equal to c).

I don't know where you got your formulas from.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K