Dangling block attached to rotating block

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter tnedde
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Block Rotating
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around a mechanics problem involving two blocks connected by a string, one rotating on a table and the other dangling below. Participants explore concepts of equilibrium, work done on the dangling block, and the implications of releasing the block from different positions.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions the stability of the original equilibrium, suggesting it is unstable and that the dangling block cannot reach a new equilibrium on its own without external force.
  • Another participant asserts that the original equilibrium should be stable, indicating a disagreement on the nature of the equilibrium.
  • A participant discusses the role of conservation of angular momentum and proposes that the centrifugal force is proportional to ##r^{-3}##, leading to different scenarios of work done when pulling or pushing the dangling block.
  • One participant suggests that upon release, the block will not return to its original position but will instead move to a different position, prompting a discussion about the nature of its motion.
  • Another participant speculates that the block might overshoot the equilibrium position and enter a form of harmonic motion, although they acknowledge the need for calculations to support this idea.
  • A later reply clarifies that the term "position" is misleading, suggesting that the block will enter a different orbit instead.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the stability of the equilibrium and the behavior of the dangling block upon release. There is no consensus on these points, and the discussion remains unresolved.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference concepts such as angular momentum and centrifugal force without providing detailed calculations or definitions, leaving some assumptions and dependencies on definitions unclear.

tnedde
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I’m an applied math grad student and I wanted to check my conceptual understanding of what I thought was a basic mechanics problem. You have two blocks connected by a weightless, frictionless string passing through a tiny hole in a table. On the table, one block (mass m) rotates without friction about the hole, while the other (mass M) dangles below the hole. The dangling block is at rest.

The original question was: How much work does it take to move the dangling block down a distance d (presumably to a new static equilibrium)? However, if my current understanding is correct, it would be impossible for it to reach a new equilibrium on its own, because the original equilibrium is unstable. As soon as you nudge the dangling block, it should accelerate over time. So the least you could do would be to hold up the block to maintain the equilibrium, but of course this would involve doing negative work to slow it down (the textbook's solution gives a positive answer, which is where the difficulty first started for me).

Does this seem correct? I’m happy to share my reasoning, but I’m curious to have someone else take a crack at it.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If you release the block again it will move to a different position (not the original one and not the one where you released it).
tnedde said:
because the original equilibrium is unstable.
The original equilibrium should be stable.
 
According to my calc, because of conservation of angular momentum, the centrifugal force will be proportional to ##r^{-3}##. That enables us to do work in the following ways:

1. Pull the dangling block down. Resistance will be encountered and as soon as we stop pulling, it will start moving back up, because the upwards force is more than the block's weight. But we can measure the work done while we were pulling down. It's easiest to imagine this if we pull very slowly, so we can ignore any downwards momentum and associated kinetic energy of the dangling block when we stop pulling.

2. Push the dangling block up. Again we do this very slowly so we can ignore the dangling block's momentum and KE. As soon as we stop pushing, the block will start to move back down, as the centrifugal force will be less than the block's weight. But again we can measure the work done while pushing the block up.

In both cases we will have done positive work.
 
mfb said:
If you release the block again it will move to a different position (not the original one and not the one where you released it).
Do you think so? I would have though that it would return towards the equilibrium position, overshoot because of its momentum and then enter a (probably non-simple) harmonic motion about that position. But I haven't done any calcs.
 
Hmm right, "position" is not the right word. It will enter a different orbit.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
5K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
6K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K