Daniell cell initial equilibrium

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the electrochemical behavior of a Daniell cell at initial equilibrium without an external electric connection. It establishes that both Zinc and Copper electrodes acquire a charge due to electron transfer, with Zinc becoming more negatively charged due to oxidation, while Copper experiences a reduction process that leads to a positive charge. The potential difference between the electrodes arises from their differing electronegativities, and while the potential of one electrode can be measured against a standard, the absolute potential of a single electrode remains indeterminate without a current flow.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electrochemistry principles, specifically oxidation and reduction reactions.
  • Familiarity with the Daniell cell configuration and its components.
  • Knowledge of electrode potentials and their measurement techniques.
  • Basic concepts of ionic solutions and their behavior in electrochemical cells.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the Nernst equation for calculating electrode potentials in electrochemical cells.
  • Study the principles of galvanic cells and their applications in real-world scenarios.
  • Explore the effects of concentration gradients on electrode behavior in electrochemical systems.
  • Investigate the role of salt bridges in maintaining charge balance in electrochemical cells.
USEFUL FOR

Chemistry students, electrochemists, and anyone interested in the principles of electrochemical cells and their applications in energy storage and conversion.

cianfa72
Messages
2,953
Reaction score
308
TL;DR
About the equilibrium reached at Daniell cell electrodes without any external connection
Hello,

consider again a simple Daniell cell with salt bridge in place but no external electric connection between electrodes.

Reading from some source e.g. link1 it seems upon Zinc and Copper metal rods are dipped into their own ions solution, both will gain a negative charge (-) due to an excess of electrons gained inside themselves (metal atoms get oxidised). Having Zinc and Copper different electronegativity, the amount of electrons gained on each electrode will be not the same resulting in a potential difference voltage between them.

From other sources instead (e.g. link2), the Copper rod (Cathode) will behave the other way around: Cu++ ions reduction will take place "stealing" electrons from the Copper rod leaving it positively charged (in other words there will be a depletion of electrons inside the Copper metal rod with an unbalance between protons and electrons inside it)

Which is the truth ?
 
Last edited:
Chemistry news on Phys.org
I'm not sure we know. We can measure the potential difference between two electrodes, so if we define the potential of one electrode (0.0V for the standard hydrogen electrode), we can assign electrode potentials to other electrodes. But we can't (I think) measure the potential of a single electrode, so we don't know absolutely how positive or negative the metal is.

I don't think link 2 actually states that Cu becomes positive in the absence of an electrical connection (Cu
2+ is reduced when a current flows); only that Cu is more positive/less negative than Zn. Likewise link 1, at least at the beginning, talks about what happens when a metal is immersed in water (not a solution of its ions).
 
mjc123 said:
I don't think link 2 actually states that Cu becomes positive in the absence of an electrical connection (Cu
2+ is reduced when a current flows); only that Cu is more positive/less negative than Zn. Likewise link 1, at least at the beginning, talks about what happens when a metal is immersed in water (not a solution of its ions).
See also here link 3: for Copper osmotic pressure is greater then solution pressure thus the copper electrode will gain positive charge developing a positive potential (even though there is no current flow)
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
5K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
4K
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
7K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K