De Broglie Wavelength Calculation for an Electron with KE= 8.5 eV

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The De Broglie wavelength of an electron with a kinetic energy (KE) of 8.5 eV is calculated using the formula λ = h/p, where h is Planck's constant and p is momentum. The user converted 8.5 eV to joules, calculated the velocity as 1729006.11 m/s, and subsequently determined the momentum to be 1.575e-24 kg·m/s. The final wavelength calculated was λ = 4.209e-10 m, which is approximately 420.9 pm. However, the user encountered discrepancies with the expected answer, suggesting a potential issue with the problem statement or the system used for submission.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of De Broglie wavelength calculations
  • Familiarity with kinetic energy equations (KE = 0.5mv²)
  • Knowledge of momentum (p = mv)
  • Ability to convert energy units (eV to joules)
NEXT STEPS
  • Review the concept of relativistic momentum (p = γm₀v) and its implications
  • Learn about the significance of significant figures in physics calculations
  • Explore the relationship between kinetic energy in eV and keV
  • Investigate common errors in De Broglie wavelength calculations
USEFUL FOR

Students studying quantum mechanics, physics educators, and anyone involved in solving problems related to particle physics and wave-particle duality.

starthorn
Messages
7
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


What is the De Broglie wavelength of an electron with KE= 8.5 eV?


Homework Equations


λ=h/p
KE=0.5mv2
p=mv


The Attempt at a Solution


I converted 8.5 eV into joules:
8/5 eV × 1.602e-19 J = 1.3617e-18

Then used it for KE to solve for v:
I got 1729006.11

Used v to get p:
9.11e-31 × 1729006.11 = 1.575e-24

Used p to get λ:
6.63e-34/1.575e-24

And received λ= 4.209e-10

The answer required is on the order of picometers, and when I convert it to pm the answer is wrong. Entering it as it is also comes up wrong.
Sorry I use excessive sigfigs, my homework is through the Connect system for my textbook and there is a VERY SMALL margin of error so you always have to keep a bunch of extra or the answer might come up as wrong if you round too early.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You might need to use the relativistic momentum:
p=γm0v
(γ is the lorentz factor)
 
starthorn said:
What is the De Broglie wavelength of an electron with KE= 8.5 eV?

Are you sure it's not KE = 8.5 keV? Your calculations look OK.

The answer required is on the order of picometers

What is it?

Sorry I use excessive sigfigs,

Ideally you should not round at all until you reach the final answer, i.e. keep the intermediate numbers in your calculator as you go along. Or better yet, derive an equation that let's you plug in your given numbers and get the final answer immediately. But I don't think that's your problem.
 
Nessdude14 said:
You might need to use the relativistic momentum:
p=γm0v
(γ is the lorentz factor)
The hint portion of the problem states that it is not relativistic but I will check my calculations with it. Seeing as how the velocity I calculated is slightly under 0.006c though I am sure it is not.

jtbell said:
Are you sure it's not KE = 8.5 keV? Your calculations look OK.

Part a is in eV and part b is in keV, so yes I am sure


jtbell said:
What is it?
I can't see the answer without "giving up" on the problem, which means I will lose the credit for it. I know, it is an awful faulty system, but what can I do? It's the one my professor uses.
 
It's definitely not relativistic, as stated. 8.5 eV << 511 keV (the rest-energy of an electron).

Either you're missing something in the problem statement, or the answer in the "system" is simply wrong. Textbooks do sometimes have a wrong answer for a problem.

I tried using different units for the intermediate steps and I still get the same answer.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K