De Broglie wavelength of an electron

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the de Broglie wavelength of an electron and an alpha particle given a kinetic energy of 2 MeV. Participants clarify the use of relativistic kinetic energy formulas, emphasizing the distinction between invariant mass and effective mass. The correct approach for the electron involves using a total energy of 2.51 MeV, while for the alpha particle, the low-velocity formula K = (1/2)mv² is appropriate due to its rest energy being significantly higher than the kinetic energy. The electron is identified as a relativistic particle, whereas the alpha particle is not.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of relativistic kinetic energy equations
  • Knowledge of de Broglie wavelength calculations
  • Familiarity with concepts of invariant mass and effective mass
  • Basic principles of particle physics, particularly regarding electrons and alpha particles
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the de Broglie wavelength formula for relativistic particles
  • Learn about relativistic energy-momentum relations in particle physics
  • Explore the differences between classical and relativistic kinetic energy
  • Investigate the properties and calculations related to alpha particles in nuclear physics
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in physics, particularly those focusing on quantum mechanics and particle physics, as well as anyone involved in advanced calculations of particle behavior under relativistic conditions.

Cay
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I'm reposting this thread with some editing suggested by fresh_42:

1. Homework Statement

Calculate the mass, velocity and the de Broglie wavelength of an electron and an alpha particle, given the kinetic energy K = 2MeV

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution



please find attached![/B]


I went through my calculations again and I think I have one problem in determining the formula of relativistic kinetic energy. What I used is: E = m*c^2, where m - the effective mass of the electron. I'm afraid I should've used
E = m*c^2 - m0*c^2, where m = m0/sqrt(1-β^2). Is that correct?
 

Attachments

  • IMG_3671.jpg
    IMG_3671.jpg
    73.6 KB · Views: 628
Physics news on Phys.org
You're correct about the error. I prefer to use ##m## to refer to the invariant (rest) mass, but to avoid confusion I'll stick with your notation and terminology. So ##K = mc^2 - m_0c^2## or ##(m - m_0)c^2##.

Or you could just say the total energy is 2 MeV plus the rest energy of the electron, 0.511 MeV. So then ##mc^2 = 2.51## MeV. Go through all the same steps but using that value of total energy rather than the 2 MeV.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Cay
RPinPA said:
You're correct about the error. I prefer to use ##m## to refer to the invariant (rest) mass, but to avoid confusion I'll stick with your notation and terminology. So ##K = mc^2 - m_0c^2## or ##(m - m_0)c^2##.

Or you could just say the total energy is 2 MeV plus the rest energy of the electron, 0.511 MeV. So then ##mc^2 = 2.51## MeV. Go through all the same steps but using that value of total energy rather than the 2 MeV.
Thank you for replying!
However, if I apply the relativistic energy formula also for the alpha particle, I get that effective mass is approximately the same as the rest mass. So I would get that β=0, which is not possible. What am I doing wrong?
 
Cay said:
Thank you for replying!
However, if I apply the relativistic energy formula also for the alpha particle, I get that effective mass is approximately the same as the rest mass. So I would get that β=0, which is not possible. What am I doing wrong?

An alpha particle is two protons and two neutrons, each of which has a rest energy of approximately 1 GeV. So 2 MeV is a very small fraction of the rest energy and this particle is not relativistic. Use the low-velocity formula ##K = (1/2)mv^2##.

To be precise, the rest energy of an alpha is 3.727 GeV, so 2 MeV kinetic energy increases that to 3.729 GeV total energy. If you want to use the relativistic formula, the increase is a factor of 3.729/3.727 = 1.00054 = ##1/\sqrt{1-\beta^2}##. ##\beta## is indeed close to zero, meaning as I said this is not a relativistic particle and it is moving at a small fraction of ##c##.

In contrast, the electron has a total energy of 2.5 MeV which is nearly 5 times its rest energy, so that is definitely a relativistic particle.

It's often a good idea to first do a sanity check to see "is this a relativistic particle or not?"
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K