Jedi_Sawyer
- 65
- 0
Does anybody know of claims that there is a way to get around Newton's 3rd Law and Conservation of Momentum and have a link to where I might find that write up?
The discussion revolves around claims regarding potential methods to bypass Newton's 3rd Law and the Conservation of Momentum, particularly in the context of propulsion systems that do not expel mass. Participants explore theoretical concepts and examples, including the use of light and electromagnetic fields, while questioning the validity of such claims.
Participants generally disagree on the possibility of violating Newton's 3rd Law, with some asserting that no working designs exist that can do so, while others propose theoretical models that might challenge the law under specific conditions.
The discussion highlights the limitations of applying Newton's laws universally, particularly in scenarios involving electromagnetic fields and quantum mechanics, without resolving the implications of these limitations.
Jedi_Sawyer said:I mean something propelling itself in a vacuum wthout throwing off mass.
For example a vehicle that uses a heated piece of tungsten at the focal point of a parabolic mirror that sends a focused light beam backwards would qualify, although I am looking for solutions that don't use flashlights.
Jedi_Sawyer said:Turtlemeister, I don't care what you call such a propulsion method.
Are you saying that Newton's 3rd Law is some sort of scientific religious idea and any thought that it could be violated is forbidden ?
Drakkith said:Nothing out there will violate Newtons laws. At least not working designs.
olivermsun said:Well, I have no idea if it has any relation to a working design, but "every action has an equal and opposite reaction" doesn't always hold.
Drakkith said:Can you give me an example?

Jedi_Sawyer said:Turtlemeister, I don't care what you call such a propulsion method.
Are you saying that Newton's 3rd Law is some sort of scientific religious idea and any thought that it could be violated is forbidden ?
Doc Al said:Hint: Electrodynamics.
olivermsun said:Think moving charges and magnetic fields. (I can't claim credit for this textbook example).
Edit: Doc Al beat me to it.![]()
Drakkith said:I guess I should have said: Nothing violates the 3rd law when you use it where it applies.