Decompose Vector (2,3,-1): Find Distance to Subspace

  • Thread starter Thread starter PhizKid
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Vector
Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on decomposing the vector (2, 3, -1) into components from a specified subspace and its orthogonal complement. The subspace consists of vectors in the form (x, 2y, x), and the orthogonal complement was initially thought to contain only the zero vector. However, it is clarified that the kernel of the transformation matrix is not just the zero vector, indicating a two-dimensional subspace. The participants discuss the correct representation of the transformation matrix and its implications for finding the distance from the vector to the subspace. The conversation emphasizes the need for accurate dimensional analysis in vector decomposition problems.
PhizKid
Messages
477
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


There is a subspace that contains all the vectors in the form (x, 2y, x). Decompose the vector (2, 3, -1) into a sum of an element from the orthogonal complement of this subspace and an element from the subspace. Find the distance from (2, 3, -1) to this subspace.

The Attempt at a Solution


To find the orthogonal complement of this subspace, I found the kernel, which in this case happens to only contain the zero vector. That means only a particular solution exists, but obviously (2, 3, -1) is not a particular solution, so I'm not sure how to decompose this, much less find the distance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
PhizKid said:

Homework Statement


There is a subspace that contains all the vectors in the form (x, 2y, x). Decompose the vector (2, 3, -1) into a sum of an element from the orthogonal complement of this subspace and an element from the subspace. Find the distance from (2, 3, -1) to this subspace.

The Attempt at a Solution


To find the orthogonal complement of this subspace, I found the kernel, which in this case happens to only contain the zero vector. That means only a particular solution exists, but obviously (2, 3, -1) is not a particular solution, so I'm not sure how to decompose this, much less find the distance.

Why do you say the kernel is only the zero vector? ##(x,2y,x)=x(1,0,1)+y(0,2,0)## is clearly only two dimensional.
 
Last edited:
Found the kernel of what?
 
The kernel of
##\ \left( \begin{array}{ccc}
1 & 0 \\
0 & 1 \\
1 & 0 \end{array} \right)##
 
Your domain should be R3, not R2.
 
So then it's:
##\ \left( \begin{array}{ccc}
1 & 0 & 0 \\
0 & 1 & 0 \\
1 & 0 & 0 \end{array} \right)##
?
 
PhizKid said:
So then it's:
##\ \left( \begin{array}{ccc}
1 & 0 & 0 \\
0 & \color{red}{2} & 0 \\
1 & 0 & 0 \end{array} \right)##
?

Yes, that matrix represents the transformation ##(x,y,z)\rightarrow (x,2y,x)##.

[Edit]: There would be a 2 in the center.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
7K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
1K
Replies
29
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K