Decreasing the resistance at constant voltage

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the relationship between resistance, current, and voltage, specifically addressing the assertion that decreasing resistance increases current when voltage is held constant. Participants are examining the validity of this statement in the context of electrical circuits.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Some participants question the completeness of the problem statement, noting it lacks a clear question. Others express confusion about the book's classification of the statement as false, suggesting there may be additional context or assumptions that need to be considered.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants exploring the implications of the statement and questioning the reasoning behind the book's answer. There is a recognition that further context may be necessary to fully understand the problem.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the original problem appears to be framed as a true-or-false question, which may limit the depth of analysis. There is mention of potential overarching principles from earlier problems that could influence the interpretation of the current discussion.

Perseverence
Messages
88
Reaction score
7

Homework Statement


decreasing the resistance increases the current if the voltage remains unchanged.

Homework Equations


V=IR

The Attempt at a Solution


The solution in the book does not count this as a true statement, but it seems true to me. Is there any reason why the statement would be false?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Perseverence said:

Homework Statement


decreasing the resistance increases the current if the voltage remains unchanged.

Homework Equations


V=IR

The Attempt at a Solution


The solution in the book does not count this as a true statement, but it seems true to me. Is there any reason why the statement would be false?

I don't see a complete statement of the problem to be solved in the problem statement section of your post; I see only a declarative sentence.

What is the exact question or problem as posed to you? Without knowing the full context helpers might have to make unwarranted assumptions.
 
gneill said:
I don't see a complete statement of the problem to be solved in the problem statement section of your post; I see only a declarative sentence.

What is the exact question or problem as posed to you? Without knowing the full context helpers might have to make unwarranted assumptions.
There is no complete problem. This was a true-or-false question.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Perseverence said:
The solution in the book does not count this as a true statement, but it seems true to me. Is there any reason why the statement would be false?
On the face of it as you have posted it, the statement would appear to be true, for the reason that you have. But if the book says it is false, then as @gneill says, there must be more to the problem. Perhaps there is an overall context that is supposed to be applied? Like an overall statement about a circuit that is given a couple problems earlier that applies to the next 4 questions, or something like that?
 
As I've said before, there was not anything else to this question. It was a true-or-false question. It looks as though the solution guide was wrong. Thank you for your help.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K