Given that 1/x is symetric across y=x, why can't we say [tex]\int^1_0 1/x - x dx= \int^\infty_1 1/x + x dx[/tex]? Geometrically, it makes sense, but ln(0) is clearly undefined.
from 1 to infinity the integral is unboundedly large. ln(x) tends to -infinity as x tends to 0, so the other integral is also unboundedly large. I think there's nothing wrong with saying the areas are equal