Definite trigonometric integral using properties

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on evaluating the definite integral ##I_n = \int_0^\frac {\pi}{4} \sec^n x \, dx##, specifically calculating ##I_{10} - \frac {8}{9} I_8##. Participants explore using properties of indefinite integrals and reduction formulas, with insights into the integration of even powers of secant. The conversation highlights the tedious nature of the calculations and the potential for simplification through clever techniques, such as using the binomial theorem for higher powers.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of trigonometric functions, specifically secant and tangent.
  • Familiarity with integration techniques, including integration by parts.
  • Knowledge of reduction formulas in calculus.
  • Basic understanding of the binomial theorem for polynomial expansion.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the derivation of reduction formulas for ##\int \sec^n x \, dx##.
  • Study the application of the binomial theorem in calculus, particularly in integration.
  • Practice evaluating integrals of even powers of secant using substitution methods.
  • Explore video resources on advanced integration techniques for trigonometric functions.
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in calculus, particularly those focusing on integration techniques and trigonometric integrals. This discussion is beneficial for anyone looking to enhance their problem-solving skills in advanced calculus.

Krushnaraj Pandya
Gold Member
Messages
697
Reaction score
73

Homework Statement


If ## I_n = \int_0^\frac {\pi}{4} \sec^n x dx## then find ## I_{10} - \frac {8}{9} I_8##

2. The attempt at a solution
this should be solvable by reduction formulae but since it'd be longer I wanted to know if there was a way to do it using mostly properties of indefinite integrals as suggested by my textbook. I'd appreciate the help, thank you
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Krushnaraj Pandya said:

Homework Statement


If ## I_n = \int_0^\frac {\pi}{4} \sec^n x dx## then find ## I_{10} - \frac {8}{9} I_8##

2. The attempt at a solution
this should be solvable by reduction formulae but since it'd be longer I wanted to know if there was a way to do it using mostly properties of indefinite integrals as suggested by my textbook. I'd appreciate the help, thank you
I would start by finding ##I_2## and ##I_4## to see if I can deduce a pattern.
 
Mark44 said:
I would start by finding ##I_2## and ##I_4## to see if I can deduce a pattern.
I2 is tanx which evaluates to 1. I4 is tanx+(tanx^3) which is 4/3; I went further ahead to calculate I6 too, I guess the integration isn't very hard since you just have to substitute tanx as t everytime but I didn't see a pattern in the final-integrated functions
 
Krushnaraj Pandya said:
I2 is tanx which evaluates to 1. I4 is tanx+(tanx^3) which is 4/3; I went further ahead to calculate I6 too, I guess the integration isn't very hard since you just have to substitute tanx as t everytime but I didn't see a pattern in the final-integrated functions
I got the correct answer but the process was quite tedious
 
Krushnaraj Pandya said:
I got the correct answer but the process was quite tedious

Welcome to calculus (especially integration). Sometimes solutions are lengthy, and there is no way of shortening them. Of course, sometimes the opposite is true, IF some clever insights are used---not always, however.
 
Krushnaraj Pandya said:
you just have to substitute tanx as t everytime

If that's true, can you evaluate ##\int sec^{2k} x dx##?

(There's a Youtube video about developing a reduction formula for ##\int \sec^n x dx##. It writes ##\sec^n x## as ##(\sec^{n-2} x)( \sec^2 x)##. Then it uses integration by parts followed by using the identity ##\tan^2x = \sec^2x -1##. However, the presenter remarks "The integrals of even powers of secant are easy". So the person who posed your problem may have a simpler method in mind.)
 
Ray Vickson said:
Welcome to calculus (especially integration). Sometimes solutions are lengthy, and there is no way of shortening them. Of course, sometimes the opposite is true, IF some clever insights are used---not always, however.
hahaha, well I'm here to learn to get those intuitions at the end of the day I guess. (otherwise you could probably integrate anything by a long string of algorithmic substitutions etc)
 
Stephen Tashi said:
If that's true, can you evaluate ##\int sec^{2k} x dx##?

(There's a Youtube video about developing a reduction formula for ##\int \sec^n x dx##. It writes ##\sec^n x## as ##(\sec^{n-2} x)( \sec^2 x)##. Then it uses integration by parts followed by using the identity ##\tan^2x = \sec^2x -1##. However, the presenter remarks "The integrals of even powers of secant are easy". So the person who posed your problem may have a simpler method in mind.)
I can develop the reduction formula myself (but that'd still be lengthy if for example this question was in my entrance exams for a grad school- I'd never have the time to do it), but what I did was just write ##\sec^n x## as ##(\sec^{n-2} x)( \sec^2 x)## then directly put tanx=t instead of by parts (as done in the video). So I ended up having to solve ## (1 + t^2 )^4 ## for ##I_{10}## and then integrating the polynomial obtained. The same, just with power 3 for ##I_8##. There probably isn't anything quicker than this but I'm not sure (for example- what'd we do if we had sec^22, can't keep multiplying 1+t^2 20 times)
 
Use the binomial theorem.
 
  • #10
vela said:
Use the binomial theorem.
I'm afraid that's two chapters ahead...so I only know the basics of binomial theorem till now- as in I can expand (1+x)^k etc., not sure how I can use it here
 
  • #11
Krushnaraj Pandya said:
There probably isn't anything quicker than this but I'm not sure (for example- what'd we do if we had sec^22, can't keep multiplying 1+t^2 20 times)
Krushnaraj Pandya said:
I'm afraid that's two chapters ahead...so I only know the basics of binomial theorem till now- as in I can expand (1+x)^k etc., not sure how I can use it here
That's the form of ##(1+t^2)^{20}##, is it not?
 
  • #12
vela said:
That's the form of ##(1+t^2)^{20}##, is it not?
oh, right sorry! how silly of me. Thank you, that's a really good way to evaluate higher powers.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 105 ·
4
Replies
105
Views
6K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K