Definition of a complex matrix

Click For Summary
A complex matrix is defined as one whose elements may include complex numbers, which means real matrices are also considered complex since they are contained within the set of complex matrices. The discussion clarifies that Hermitian matrices are indeed a subset of complex matrices, but they do not form a vector space over the complex numbers due to the nature of their multiplication. A participant expressed confusion regarding the relationship between a linear map and Hermitian matrices in a specific expression, leading to a deeper exploration of the definitions. Ultimately, the participant resolved their issue, realizing their concerns were unnecessary. The conversation highlights the nuances of matrix classifications and their implications in mathematical expressions.
_Andreas
Messages
141
Reaction score
1
http://mathworld.wolfram.com/ComplexMatrix.html" states that a complex matrix is "a matrix whose elements may contain complex numbers". My question is what the "may" means. Could a matrix be complex even if its elements does not contain any complex numbers?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Real matrices are contained in the set of complex matrices. In that sense they are also complex. That's the only sense in which they are complex. A real matrix is, uh, real.
 
Dick said:
Real matrices are contained in the set of complex matrices. In that sense they are also complex. That's the only sense in which they are complex. A real matrix is, uh, real.

Thanks. I have a follow-up question if you don't mind: does this mean that an element in the \mathbb{R}-vector space Herm_n(\mathbb{C}) (the set of all hermitian n x n-matrices) is also an element in \mathbb{C}^n?
 
Last edited:
If you mean is the set of all hermitian matrices a subset of the set of all complex matrices, of course it is. Why do you need to ask?
 
Dick said:
If you mean is the set of all hermitian matrices a subset of the set of all complex matrices, of course it is. Why do you need to ask?

Because I'm trying to solve a problem in which there is an expression AB, where A is a \mathbb{C}-linear map A:\mathbb{C}^n\rightarrow\mathbb{C}^n and B \in \msbox{Herm_n}(\mathbb{C}). If B doesn't also lie in \mathbb{C}^n, I can't make sense of the expression.
 
Last edited:
Adding to my confusion was this statement on Wikipedia:
The Hermitian n-by-n matrices form a vector space over the real numbers (but not over the complex numbers).
 
_Andreas said:
I can't make sense of the expression.
What's wrong with reading it as simply being the product of linear operators?
 
_Andreas said:
Because I'm trying to solve a problem in which there is an expression AB, where A is a \mathbb{C}-linear map A:\mathbb{C}^n\rightarrow\mathbb{C}^n and B \in \msbox{Herm_n}(\mathbb{C}). If B doesn't also lie in \mathbb{C}^n, I can't make sense of the expression.

We have agreed Herm_n(C) does lie in the set nxn complex matrices, right? It's not a vector space over C because if you multiply a hermitian matrix by i it's no longer hermitian. But I don't see why that needs to concern you.
 
Dick said:
We have agreed Herm_n(C) does lie in the set nxn complex matrices, right?

Yes.

Dick said:
It's not a vector space over C because if you multiply a hermitian matrix by i it's no longer hermitian.

Very helpful! Thanks.

Dick said:
But I don't see why that needs to concern you.

I've actually solved the problem, and you're right, it was unnecessary for me to be concerned by it.

Thanks again for your help.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
863
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K