Degenerated perturbation theory

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the application of degenerate perturbation theory to the Stark effect, particularly in the context of the hydrogen atom's |2s> state. Participants clarify that while non-degenerate perturbation theory can easily yield corrections for individual states, degenerate perturbation theory requires treating the entire n=2 level collectively. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding the linear and quadratic Stark effects, as well as the transition between different bases for accurate energy shift calculations. Key references include the Bohr model and the Schrödinger equations for resolving issues related to the Stark effect.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of degenerate perturbation theory
  • Familiarity with the Stark effect in quantum mechanics
  • Knowledge of the hydrogen atom's quantum states, particularly |1s> and |2s>
  • Basic principles of quantum mechanics, including Hamiltonians and eigenstates
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the linear Stark effect and its implications on hydrogen atom states
  • Explore the differences between degenerate and non-degenerate perturbation theory
  • Investigate the application of the Schrödinger equation in resolving Stark effect problems
  • Review Section 19 of the provided Bohr model notes for detailed insights on |2s> corrections
USEFUL FOR

Quantum mechanics students, physicists specializing in atomic theory, and researchers exploring perturbation theory and the Stark effect will benefit from this discussion.

Lucas-
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
TL;DR
I don't understand why we cannot obtain perturbative correction to a specific eigenstate in the degenerated case (ie. |2s>)
Hello,
In the case of Stark effect for example, one may find the correction for the |1s> state easily by applying non degenerated perturbation theory. However in the degenerated case it's seems as though we can only treat the whole n=2 level for example and not individual eigen states. That, I don't understand as, in reality we could make 2s hydrogen atom and place them in an electric field. What would happen ? Why can't we get let's say the first order |2s> correction ?
When we do the usual setup, we find the common eigenkets in the degenerate subspace of the original hamiltonian and the perturbation and their associated eigen values.
We observe linear combination of eigenkets yet, they don't seem to depend on the field intensity, so this would mean that when I turn the perturbation off, If, let's say I started with a |2s> hydrogen I would keep the superposition ? Shouldn't it go back to |2s> ?

I'm a bit confuse and I would appreciate it if someone could enlighten me !
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Mordred said:
Look into parity and the linear Stark effect in regards to degenerated perturbation

See here
https://bohr.physics.berkeley.edu/classes/221/1112/notes/stark.pdf

Section 19 goes into detail on 2s
So if I understand correctly, we find a new basis in which the perturbation is diagonal and when we want a specific ket we can write it in this new basis and we'll get the energy shift we want when we turn on the perturbation ?
 
In essence yes but extra care must be dealt with. You may or may not have noted that the Stark effect is described by Old Quantum Mechanics using the Bohr model. There is a further detail to add to your statement above. "With standard first-order degenerate perturbation theory the Hamilton operator is diagonal in parabolic coordinates but not in spherical coordinates between the perturbed and unperturbed relations. "

However numerous problems with the Stark effect gets resolved using the Schrödinger equations and wave mechanics.
A good coverage of these details can be found here.
https://arxiv.org/abs/1404.5333

The above quotation is directly from said article.

Key note the two Stark effects are linear (first order) and quadratic (parabolic)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K