Degenerated perturbation theory

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around degenerate perturbation theory, particularly in the context of the Stark effect and its implications for the hydrogen atom's |2s> state. Participants explore the challenges of applying perturbation theory to degenerate states and the resulting superpositions when an electric field is applied.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses confusion about why individual eigenstates like |2s> cannot be treated separately in degenerate perturbation theory, despite the possibility of creating a 2s hydrogen atom in an electric field.
  • Another participant suggests looking into parity and the linear Stark effect, referencing a specific resource that discusses the 2s state in detail.
  • A later reply reiterates the importance of finding a new basis where the perturbation is diagonal and discusses how to obtain energy shifts for specific kets in this new basis.
  • One participant notes that while the statement about diagonalization in a new basis is essentially correct, there are additional complexities, including the distinction between parabolic and spherical coordinates in the context of the Stark effect.
  • It is mentioned that the Stark effect can be described using both Old Quantum Mechanics and wave mechanics, with references to further literature for deeper understanding.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the treatment of degenerate states in perturbation theory, and there are multiple viewpoints regarding the implications of the Stark effect and the appropriate mathematical framework.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the need for careful consideration of coordinate systems when applying degenerate perturbation theory, as well as the distinction between linear and quadratic Stark effects. There are unresolved aspects regarding the specific behavior of eigenstates under perturbation.

Lucas-
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
TL;DR
I don't understand why we cannot obtain perturbative correction to a specific eigenstate in the degenerated case (ie. |2s>)
Hello,
In the case of Stark effect for example, one may find the correction for the |1s> state easily by applying non degenerated perturbation theory. However in the degenerated case it's seems as though we can only treat the whole n=2 level for example and not individual eigen states. That, I don't understand as, in reality we could make 2s hydrogen atom and place them in an electric field. What would happen ? Why can't we get let's say the first order |2s> correction ?
When we do the usual setup, we find the common eigenkets in the degenerate subspace of the original hamiltonian and the perturbation and their associated eigen values.
We observe linear combination of eigenkets yet, they don't seem to depend on the field intensity, so this would mean that when I turn the perturbation off, If, let's say I started with a |2s> hydrogen I would keep the superposition ? Shouldn't it go back to |2s> ?

I'm a bit confuse and I would appreciate it if someone could enlighten me !
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Mordred said:
Look into parity and the linear Stark effect in regards to degenerated perturbation

See here
https://bohr.physics.berkeley.edu/classes/221/1112/notes/stark.pdf

Section 19 goes into detail on 2s
So if I understand correctly, we find a new basis in which the perturbation is diagonal and when we want a specific ket we can write it in this new basis and we'll get the energy shift we want when we turn on the perturbation ?
 
In essence yes but extra care must be dealt with. You may or may not have noted that the Stark effect is described by Old Quantum Mechanics using the Bohr model. There is a further detail to add to your statement above. "With standard first-order degenerate perturbation theory the Hamilton operator is diagonal in parabolic coordinates but not in spherical coordinates between the perturbed and unperturbed relations. "

However numerous problems with the Stark effect gets resolved using the Schrödinger equations and wave mechanics.
A good coverage of these details can be found here.
https://arxiv.org/abs/1404.5333

The above quotation is directly from said article.

Key note the two Stark effects are linear (first order) and quadratic (parabolic)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
4K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K