Delay and Sum Beamforming Equation Derivation

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the derivation and simplification of equations related to delay and sum beamforming. Participants are attempting to transition from one equation to another, exploring relationships between variables and seeking clarification on specific terms and assumptions.

Discussion Character

  • Homework-related
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents an initial equation (equation 1) and seeks to simplify it to two subsequent forms (equation 2 and equation 3).
  • Another participant questions the meaning of the term M_(1/2) and suggests a possible reformulation of equation 1.
  • A participant clarifies that M_(1/2) is a subscript and indicates they are seeking guidance from the math department due to difficulties in simplification.
  • There is a discussion about the relationship between M and M_(1/2), with one participant stating that to achieve equation 2, M must equal (2*M_(1/2)+1).
  • Another participant inquires whether the assumption about M was made prior to deriving equation 1 and suggests expressing certain terms in relation to sine functions.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not appear to reach a consensus on the relationships between the variables or the assumptions made in the derivation process. Multiple viewpoints and questions remain unresolved.

Contextual Notes

There are missing assumptions regarding the definitions of M and M_(1/2), as well as the steps taken to derive the equations. The discussion reflects uncertainty about the mathematical transformations involved.

mastrepolo
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I have to simplify this beam form (equation 1) which simplifies to equation 2 and then finally to equation 3.

Homework Equations


equation 1: e^-ix((1-e^y)/(1-e^z)) where x = Beta*M_(1/2), y = beta*M, z= Beta

equation 2: sin(M*Beta/2)/(sin(Beta/2))

equation 3: M((sinc(M*Beta/2pi))/(sinc(Beta/2pi))) where sinc(x) = sin(pi*x)/pi*x

Eulors: e^jx = cos(x) +j*sin(x)

The Attempt at a Solution



I have tries to use eulors equation to change it to sine sand cosine but I can't seem to get the proper cancellations i am looking for.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
mastrepolo said:
equation 1: e^-ix((1-e^y)/(1-e^z)) where x = Beta*M_(1/2), y = beta*M, z= Beta
What is M_(1/2)?
Do you mean ##e^{-i\frac{\beta}2(M-1)}\frac{1-e^{i\beta M}}{1-e^{i\beta}}##?
 
Sorry about the late response. It is M1/2 as a subscript, I attached a picture. I am going to the math department for some guidance since I can't seem to figure this one out. Any help would be appreciated,
 

Attachments

  • Screen Shot 2018-10-29 at 9.15.20 PM.png
    Screen Shot 2018-10-29 at 9.15.20 PM.png
    2.3 KB · Views: 472
mastrepolo said:
It is M1/2 as a subscript,
So what is the relationship between that and M? To get your eqn 2 I need it to equal (M-1)/2.
 
haruspex said:
So what is the relationship between that and M? To get your eqn 2 I need it to equal (M-1)/2.

To get it in this form we had to assume M = 2*M1/2+1. so . There were some other step to get it into the equation form but this is where it originated from.
 

Attachments

  • Screen Shot 2018-10-29 at 10.45.29 PM.png
    Screen Shot 2018-10-29 at 10.45.29 PM.png
    1.4 KB · Views: 460
mastrepolo said:
To get it in this form
Are you saying to get eqn 1 you already assumed that?
I assume you know how to write sin x in terms of eix.
Can you see how to write 1-e-ix as some function f(x) multiplied by a sine function (not necessarily sin(x), exactly).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K