Claim: if [tex]\psi[/tex] is a variable grassmann number, then [tex]\delta(\psi)=\psi[/tex] is a Dirac delta function for integrals over [tex]\psi[/tex].(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

I'm not seeing this.

A general function of a grassmann number can be written [tex]f(\psi)=a+b\psi[/tex] because anti-commutativity requires [tex]\psi^2=0[/tex]. According to the wikipedia article (which doesn't elaborate on why), integrals satisfy

[tex]\int 1 d\psi=0[/tex]

[tex]\int \psi d\psi=1[/tex]

Ok. So let's check.

[tex]\int\delta(\psi-\psi')f(\psi)d\psi[/tex]

[tex]=\int(\psi-\psi')f(\psi)d\psi[/tex]

[tex]=\int(\psi-\psi')(a+b\psi)d\psi[/tex]

[tex]=a\int \psi d\psi + 0 -a\psi'\int d\psi-b\psi'\int\psi d\psi[/tex]

[tex]=a - 0 -b\psi'[/tex]

[tex]=f(-\psi')[/tex]

[tex]\neq f(\psi')[/tex]

Are one of my assumptions wrong?

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Delta function for grassmann numbers?

Loading...

Similar Threads - Delta function grassmann | Date |
---|---|

I Kronecker Delta summation (easy) | Aug 27, 2016 |

Backwards difference matrix divided by negative delta x? | Nov 25, 2015 |

Question regarding Kronecker Delta | Aug 29, 2013 |

Must the Fourier transform exist for Dirac delta functions? | Jul 28, 2012 |

Algebraic structure of Dirac delta functions | Jun 1, 2012 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**