Claim: if [tex]\psi[/tex] is a variable grassmann number, then [tex]\delta(\psi)=\psi[/tex] is a Dirac delta function for integrals over [tex]\psi[/tex].(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

I'm not seeing this.

A general function of a grassmann number can be written [tex]f(\psi)=a+b\psi[/tex] because anti-commutativity requires [tex]\psi^2=0[/tex]. According to the wikipedia article (which doesn't elaborate on why), integrals satisfy

[tex]\int 1 d\psi=0[/tex]

[tex]\int \psi d\psi=1[/tex]

Ok. So let's check.

[tex]\int\delta(\psi-\psi')f(\psi)d\psi[/tex]

[tex]=\int(\psi-\psi')f(\psi)d\psi[/tex]

[tex]=\int(\psi-\psi')(a+b\psi)d\psi[/tex]

[tex]=a\int \psi d\psi + 0 -a\psi'\int d\psi-b\psi'\int\psi d\psi[/tex]

[tex]=a - 0 -b\psi'[/tex]

[tex]=f(-\psi')[/tex]

[tex]\neq f(\psi')[/tex]

Are one of my assumptions wrong?

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Delta function for grassmann numbers?

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**