Claim:(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

[tex]\nabla \cdot \frac{\hat{e}_r}{r^2}=4\pi\delta^3(\vec{x})[/tex]

Anyone know of a proof of this? (or a reference which covers it?) We need to show that

[tex]\frac{1}{4\pi}\int_0^R{(\nabla \cdot \frac{\hat{e}_r}{r^2})f(r)dr=f(0)[/tex].

The claimed identity can be seen in the solution for the electric field of a point charge in EM theory, where

[tex]\vec{E}=\frac{q}{r^2}\hat{e}_r[/tex]

is the solution to

[tex]\nabla \cdot \vec{E}=4\pi q\delta^3(\vec{x})[/tex]

It is easy to show in this case that [tex]\nabla \cdot \vec{E}=0[/tex] everywhere but the origin, but I don't know how to show that the delta function relation holds at the origin.

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

Dismiss Notice

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Delta function representation from EM theory

Can you offer guidance or do you also need help?

Draft saved
Draft deleted

Loading...

Similar Threads for Delta function representation | Date |
---|---|

I Lebesgue Integral of Dirac Delta "function" | Nov 17, 2017 |

Dirac-delta function in spherical polar coordinates | Oct 7, 2017 |

Complex integral representation of Dirac delta function? | Dec 29, 2009 |

Strange representation of Heaviside and Delta function | Jun 4, 2008 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**