Demonstrating Subset Relationship: A ∩ B ⊆ (A ∩ C) ∪ (B ∩ C')

  • Thread starter Thread starter trixitium
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Relationship
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves demonstrating the subset relationship \( A \cap B \subset (A \cap C) \cup (B \cap C') \), where \( C' \) denotes the complement of \( C \). The context is set within a discussion of set theory and complements.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the definitions of intersections and complements, with one attempting to distribute terms and another questioning the meaning of \( C' \). There are also considerations on how to approach proving the subset relationship, including examining cases based on membership in \( C \) or \( C' \).

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, exploring different lines of reasoning and questioning assumptions. Some have provided insights into definitions and relationships, while others express uncertainty about their approaches and seek clarification on the expressions involved.

Contextual Notes

There is mention of the exercise being categorized as "some easy exercises on complementation," which may influence participants' expectations and approaches. Additionally, the discussion reflects a struggle with the complexity of the problem despite its categorization.

trixitium
Messages
7
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Show that:

[itex]A \cap B \subset (A \cap C) \cup (B \cap C')[/itex]

Homework Equations




The Attempt at a Solution



I tryed distribute [itex](A \cap C) over (B \cap C')[/itex] but I'm always walking in circles and i don't came to a satisfactory answer. This exercise was in a section "some easy exercies on complementation" but i don't see how to use complements here.

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Is [itex]C^\prime[/itex] supposed to be the complement of C??
 
The standard way to show that "[itex]X\subseteq Y[/itex]" is to start "if [itex]x\in X[/itex]" and then use the definitions of X and Y to conclude "[itex]x\in Y[/itex]".

Here, if [itex]x\in A\cap B[/itex], what can you say about x?
 
Yes, [itex]C'[/itex] is the complement of [itex]C[/itex]

if [itex]x \in A \cap B[/itex],

by the definition of intersection:

[itex]A \cap B = \{x \in A : x \in B\}[/itex]

and we can conclude that x is simultaneously in A and B.

But my doubt, is how to reduced the [itex](A \cap C) \cup (B \cap C')[/itex] to a expression that i can readly see that [itex]A \cap B \subset (A \cap C) \cup (B \cap C')[/itex].

I tryed ...

[itex](A \cap C) \cup (B \cap C') =[/itex]
[itex](A' \cup C')' \cup (B' \cup C)' =[/itex]
[itex][(A' \cup C') \cap (B' \cup C)]' =[/itex]
[itex](...)[/itex]
[itex]A \cup B \cup C'[/itex]

But it takes me a lot of work, I'm not sure if this result is correct and i think that exists a better way of doing this...

Thanks
 
You certainly know that [itex]X\subset Y[/itex] if and only if [itex]X \bigcap Y=X[/itex].
[itex]X=A\bigcap B[/itex] and [itex]Y=(A \cap C) \cup (B \cap C')[/itex]

ehild
 
trixitium said:
Yes, [itex]C'[/itex] is the complement of [itex]C[/itex]

if [itex]x \in A \cap B[/itex],

by the definition of intersection:

[itex]A \cap B = \{x \in A : x \in B\}[/itex]

and we can conclude that x is simultaneously in A and B.

But my doubt, is how to reduced the [itex](A \cap C) \cup (B \cap C')[/itex] to a expression that i can readly see that [itex]A \cap B \subset (A \cap C) \cup (B \cap C')[/itex].
Good, we know x is in both A and B. And we know that x is either in C or it is NOT! That means x is C or it is in C'
Case 1: Suppose x is in C. We know it is in A therefore ...
Case 2: Suppose x is in C'. We know it is in B therefore ...

I tryed ...

[itex](A \cap C) \cup (B \cap C') =[/itex]
[itex](A' \cup C')' \cup (B' \cup C)' =[/itex]
[itex][(A' \cup C') \cap (B' \cup C)]' =[/itex]
[itex](...)[/itex]
[itex]A \cup B \cup C'[/itex]

But it takes me a lot of work, I'm not sure if this result is correct and i think that exists a better way of doing this...

Thanks
In my opinion, to much focus on "formulas", not enough on basic "definitions".
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K