Demystifying Centrifugal Force: Causes, Mechanics, and Myths

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of centrifugal force, exploring its mechanics, causes, and the reasons it is often labeled as a fictitious force. Participants engage in a detailed examination of centrifugal force in the context of rotating reference frames, Newtonian physics, and the experiences of individuals in rotating systems.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants explain that centrifugal force is perceived by observers in rotating frames as a necessary construct to apply Newton's laws, while others argue that it is not a real force but rather a result of inertia.
  • There is a discussion about how centrifugal force points opposite to centripetal force, with some participants questioning why this is the case and how it relates to the direction of motion.
  • One participant describes the experience of feeling a force in an amusement park ride, suggesting that this sensation is related to the centrifugal force acting on them.
  • Another participant clarifies that the centripetal force, caused by friction in a car turning, is perceived differently by passengers, who feel as if they are pushed to the side opposite the direction of the turn.
  • Some participants mention D'Alembert's Principle to further explain the relationship between inertial forces and centrifugal force.
  • There is a claim that centrifugal force acts on all objects in a rotating frame, even those without a real centripetal force acting on them, leading to further exploration of the implications of this assertion.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express various viewpoints regarding the nature of centrifugal force, with some agreeing on its role as an inertial force while others contest its classification as a real force. The discussion remains unresolved, with multiple competing views present.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the dependence on definitions of forces and reference frames, as well as the unresolved nature of how centrifugal force interacts with centripetal force in different contexts.

member 529879
How exactly does the centrifugal force work? What causes it? Why is it considered a fictous force?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
To an observer in stationary, Newtonian, space, objects fly out from the center of rotation just because they want to keep going in a straight line instead of circling around. No force is necessary to explain it. F=MA can be used the way Newton intended without dreaming up any new force. But an observer who is rotating and wants to apply F=MA in his rotating space, has to invent a force to explain why objects want to fly out from the center of rotation. Centrifugal force fits that need. He invents a force so he can use Newton's F=MA in his rotating, non-Newtonian space.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: member 529879
Okay it's starting to make more sense now, but how is it that it points opposite the centripetal force and not in the direction of motion?
 
Have you ever been spun quickly, like in an amusement park ride? In which direction do you feel a force?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: member 529879
Scheuerf said:
Okay it's starting to make more sense now, but how is it that it points opposite the centripetal force and not in the direction of motion?
The velocity is always tangential to the circle, so the bend in the velocity (the acceleration) is always toward the center. To make a free object take that turn, and not fly away straight, you must apply a centripetal force. That centripetal force is opposing the centrifugal force that tries to make the object fly away (actually just go straight away at the tangent velocity)
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: member 529879
Okay, I understand now that the centrifugal force opposes the centripetal force. But why exactly? If you imagine a car is rotating around a circular path in the labeled diagram below, the centripetal force is caused by static friction, and that people in the car will feel as if they are pushed to the left while turning. Can somebody explain why though that the friction is not opposing the path of inertia, and the centrifugal force is not in the same direction of the path of inertia.
 

Attachments

  • image.jpg
    image.jpg
    7.5 KB · Views: 549
People in the car will feel pushed to the right, not the left, (assuming you are looking down on them from above).
The path of inertia is a straight line. Friction between the wheels and the ground create a force on the car to the left (as viewed by the passengers). This is centripetal force. The passengers feel propelled to the right side of the car. The latter is centrifugal force.
 
Scheuerf said:
Okay, I understand now that the centrifugal force opposes the centripetal force. But why exactly?
To make Newtons 2nd law work, as explained in post #3.
 
  • #10
Centrifugal force is an inertial force that results from the change in momentum created by the centripetal force.

Think about when a car accelerates FORWARD but you feel a force pushing you BACK into your seat. That is the inertial force reacting the change in momentum of the car. Centrifugal force is the same thing, except it reacts the car's centripetal acceleration.

Look up D'Alembert's Principle for more reading on the topic of inertial forces.
 
  • #11
ulianjay said:
Centrifugal force is an inertial force that results from the change in momentum created by the centripetal force.
The inertial centrifugal force (in a rotating frame) acts on all objects, even those on which no real centripetal force is acting.
 
  • #12
A.T. said:
The inertial centrifugal force (in a rotating frame) acts on all objects, even those on which no real centripetal force is acting.

In a rotating reference frame all objects are by definition subjected to a centripetal acceleration. After all, a rotating reference frame is an accelerating reference frame (aka 'non-inertial') where the acceleration vector is centripetal.
 
  • #13
ulianjay said:
In a rotating reference frame all objects are by definition subjected to a centripetal acceleration.
Objects in rotating reference frames can have arbitrary accelerations, which are not necessarily centripetal.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 154 ·
6
Replies
154
Views
9K
  • · Replies 93 ·
4
Replies
93
Views
8K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
924
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K