Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Densely defined linear operators on Hilbert space and their ranges

  1. Aug 16, 2011 #1
    Suppose [itex]T[/itex] is an injective linear operator densely defined on a Hilbert space [itex]\mathcal H[/itex]. Does it follow that [itex]\mathcal R(T)[/itex] is dense in [itex]\mathcal H[/itex]? It seems right, but I can't make the proof work...

    There is a theorem that speaks to this issue in Kreyszig, and also in the notes provided by my professor; however, my professor's notes seem to indicate that the answer to the above question is "YES", whereas Kreyszig seems to indicate that it's "NO".

    Oh...and if micromass reads this, then: Thank you, so much, for helping me out over the past several days.
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Aug 16, 2011 #2
    Not at all, assuming that R(T) refers to the range of T. Let [itex]H=\ell^2[/itex], and consider the map [itex](x_1, x_2, x_3, \ldots) \mapsto (0, x_1, x_2, x_3, \ldots)[/itex]. This is everywhere defined, injective, and even continuous, but the range is not dense in H.
     
  4. Aug 16, 2011 #3

    micromass

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Education Advisor
    2016 Award

    It's (by definition) true for invertible operators however (that is: densely defined operators with a densely defined inverse). Maybe your professor meant that??
     
  5. Aug 16, 2011 #4
    That is indeed possible. This all revolves around a theorem which intends to prove that [itex]T^*[/itex] is injective and [itex](T^*)^{-1} = (T^{-1})^*[/itex].

    I'm interested in your definition of "invertible operator", though...this is the first time I've heard that! Does that pertain to something specific (i.e., spectral theory of linear operators on Banach spaces)?
     
  6. Aug 16, 2011 #5
    Great. Thanks a lot.
     
  7. Aug 17, 2011 #6

    micromass

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Education Advisor
    2016 Award

    Well, an operator T with dense domain D(T) is invertible if there exists an operator S with dense domain D(S) such that D(T)=R(S), D(S)=R(T) and STx=x for all x.

    Since your theorem deals with invertible operators, I think that this is indeed the case here...
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook




Similar Discussions: Densely defined linear operators on Hilbert space and their ranges
  1. Hilbert Spaces (Replies: 16)

  2. Hilbert Spaces? (Replies: 7)

Loading...