Density change of an object with mass

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the effects of relativistic speeds on the density of an object, specifically whether density changes as speed increases and the factors involved in such changes. The context is rooted in the special theory of relativity.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the relationship between Lorentz contraction and density, questioning how the Lorentz factor applies to mass density versus mass-energy density. There are attempts to clarify the differences in factors affecting proper mass density and mass-energy density.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided reasoning regarding the differences in density factors, while others are seeking further clarification on the physical interpretation of these changes. There is an ongoing exploration of the implications of velocity direction on contraction and density.

Contextual Notes

Participants note confusion regarding the application of Lorentz contraction to different dimensions and the definitions of proper mass density versus mass-energy density. There is also mention of a lack of comprehensive coverage of this topic in textbooks.

sudipmaity
Messages
48
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



This is an introductory special theory of relativity short question from university question paper that carried 2marks.
Does the density of an object change as its speed increases? if yes by what factor.


Homework Equations



m=m0/√[1- (v/c)2]
L=L0√[1-(v/c)2]



The Attempt at a Solution


My guess is yes .
If 1/√[1-(v/c)2]=γ lorentz factor
ρ=m/L3=m/volume(V)=(m0/V0) *γ4
ρ/ρ04.
No textbook has exclusively covered this problem except for one.
There it is written for proper mass density
ρ/ρ0=γ and it is γ2 for mass-energy density.
And V=V0/γ.
The author only mentioned the relations.Did not derive them either concisely or in detail.
I am now confused.How come lorentz factor has the same power for both length and volume?
Why and how does proper mass density and mass-energy density have different factor?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If an object has a velocity in the X-direction, are all three spatial dimensions Lorentz contracted?
 
The answer to your question is no.But nobody said here about a velocity in x direction.What if for the most general case the object is traveling in an 3d space.Shouldn't all the components contract?
 
No, all components don't contract, only the component in the direction of motion. It doesn't matter what direction it is, I just used the X-direction to make the question simpler. If it is moving with a uniform velocity, I can always rotate my coordinate system and call the direction of motion the X-direction.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
Ok so that clears up the volume factor. Could you please explain the proper mass density and mass energy density factor difference?
 
After thinking on my own question what I feel is in the case PROPER MASS DENSITY variation is only due to contraction in dimension of the body parallel to its direction of motion.Hence V=V0/γ.
m=m0.
So ρ=ρ0γ.
But for MASS-ENERGY DENSITY both the mass and volume change.
Mass increases :m=m0γ
Volume changes as above.
So ρ=ρ0γ2.
Am I right?
Do you guys concur?
If yes then what should be right answer to my first post?
Should it be γ or γ2?
 
Your reasoning is correct. As to the answer to your first question, it depends on which they are asking about. I would think that the word density refers to the proper density, but I'm not really sure.
 
What still makes my mind itch is my inability to explain the answer physically.
My answer was clearly out of mathematical intuition.
Can somebody explain PHYSICALLY why proper mass density varies by a factor γ while mass energy density by γ2?
What could be the best possible QUALITATIVE explanation?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
6K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K