Departure from Kolmogorovs -5/3 law

  • Thread starter Thread starter RandomGuy88
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Law
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the observed deviations from the Kolmogorov -5/3 law in the power spectral density (PSD) of a turbulent velocity signal. Participants explore potential reasons for the varying slopes in different regions of the flow, including the possibility of transitional flow and measurement issues. The scope includes theoretical implications of turbulence, measurement techniques, and the characteristics of turbulent flows.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant notes that the slope of the PSD in some regions is -5/3, while in others it deviates, suggesting that turbulence intensity may influence the formation of the inertial subrange.
  • Another participant suggests that the measurements may be taken in transitional flow regions or that the measurement technique could be flawed, questioning the adequacy of the equipment used.
  • A participant expresses uncertainty about the characteristics of the PSD in transitional flow, indicating a lack of general shape for such cases.
  • It is mentioned that even with violations of isotropy and homogeneity assumptions, the -5/3 law might still hold for lower order moments.
  • One participant proposes that the observed PSD behavior could be explained by the presence of dominant instability mechanisms in transitional flow, which would affect the fluctuations observed.
  • Concerns are raised about the tuning of the hot wire used for measurements and its potential impact on the results, including the possibility of frequency response issues.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the reasons for the deviations from the -5/3 law, with some attributing it to transitional flow and others suggesting measurement issues. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the exact cause of the observed phenomena.

Contextual Notes

Participants acknowledge limitations related to the assumptions of isotropy and homogeneity in Kolmogorov's theory, as well as the potential influence of measurement techniques on the results.

RandomGuy88
Messages
404
Reaction score
6
I have a time dependent turbulent velocity signal and have computed a power spectral density. What is the significance of the slope, in what appears to be the inertial subrange, not being equal to -5/3? In some regions of the flow the slope is -5/3 but in other regions it is not. In the regions where the slope is not -5/3 the turbulence intensity is considerably less (but not 0) than the regions where the slope is -5/3. I suspect in some of these regions the turbulence is still developing. Could another potential explanation be that because the local turbulence intensities are small, the local turbulence Reynolds number is smaller and therefore the separation between the large scales and the small scales is not sufficient for the inertial subrange to form?

Also in some of these regions the slope is larger and in some regions it is smaller than -5/3.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
My "guess" would be that either you are making your measurements in a region where the flow is still transitional or else your measurements themselves are flawed.

What are you using to make the measurements? If it is a Pitot probe, are you sure you have sufficient frequency response to measure the higher frequencies? If it is a hot wire, is it tuned properly?

I admittedly don't do a whole lot of work in turbulence, but I have never seen a fully turbulent flow that doesn't obey the -5/3 rule.
 
Thanks for the comments,

Transitional flow is a definite possibility in these regions and was my first thought. I do not know what a PSD in transitional flow would look like. I would be surprised if there is even a general shape that the PSD would take in transitional flow.

I am using a hotwire and it is possible that it was not tuned properly.

The Reynolds number of my flow is 1 million and the turbulence is certainly not isotopic nor homogenous which are assumptions in Kolmogorov's theory. However it is my understanding that even when these assumptions are violated the -5/3 law usually still holds for lower order moments.

Looks like I have some more investigating to do.
 
yeah there is no general PSD for a transitional flow. It would depend highly on the type of flow you are measuring and the dominant instability mechanisms at work. For example, on a flat plate, you would start seeing a peak growing at the dominant T-S frequency. As you move farther downstream, you would start seeing harmonics pop up and eventually the signal in between those peaks will start to rise up to form that typical -5/3 spectrum.

That kind of situation is, in my opinion, the most likely explanation for your observations based on how I've interpreted your original description. That would successfully explain the fact that you are getting lower fluctuations in certain areas than the -5/3 line would predict.

For the hot wire, calculate the transfer function from running the wire in pulse mode and see where your attenuation starts. That could also be an issue for you, though that would tend to suppress all frequencies to an increasing degree as you get higher in frequency, so it may not really explain what you are seeing. Under certain circumstances, you can have a wire tuned so that it amplifies the signal in the region just before the roll-off as well, so just be careful there.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
Replies
31
Views
4K