Dependance of saturated vapour preassure of external preassure

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter paweld
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Vapour
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the relationship between saturated vapor pressure and total pressure in a system containing a liquid and its vapor, specifically water. The equilibrium condition is established through the equality of chemical potentials of the liquid and gaseous phases, expressed mathematically as μ_l(p,T) = μ_g(p,T). The analysis reveals that an increase in total pressure results in an increase in saturated vapor pressure, supported by the derived relationship dp_v/dp ≈ v_l/v_v. This conclusion aligns with theoretical expectations and is referenced in "Thermal Physics" by P.M. Morse.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of chemical potential in thermodynamics
  • Familiarity with ideal gas behavior
  • Knowledge of phase equilibrium concepts
  • Basic calculus for differential equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the concept of chemical potential in detail
  • Learn about phase transitions and equilibrium states
  • Explore the ideal gas law and its applications
  • Investigate experimental evidence of vapor pressure changes in mixed gas systems
USEFUL FOR

Researchers, physicists, and chemists interested in thermodynamics, phase transitions, and vapor-liquid equilibrium phenomena.

paweld
Messages
253
Reaction score
0
I'm interested in an equillibrium state between pure liquid (e.g. water)
and its vapour preassure mixed with other gases (e.g water vapour in the atmospheric gases). I would like to compute the dependence of vapour saturated preassure
on the total preassure of the system (vapour partial preassure + preassures of all
other gases).

The saturated vapour preassure fullfill the following condition at given temperature T:
[tex] \mu_l(p,T)=\mu_g(p,T)[/tex]
(equality of chemical potentials of liquid and gaseous phases), where p is total preassure
of the system. If we assuem that vapour behaves almost like ideal gas we obtain the following
formula for its chemical potential:
[tex] \mu_g(p,T) = \mu_g^0(T) + RT \log p_v[/tex]
where [tex]p_v[/tex] is a partial preassure of vapour. So we can express the equillibrium
condition as follows:
[tex] \mu_l(p,T)=\mu_g^0(T) + RT \log p_v(p)[/tex]
where p is the total preassure of the system, i.e. the sum of the vapour partial preassure
[tex]p_v[/tex]and the other gases total preassure [tex]p_0[/tex].
(I've written partial vapour preassure as a function of total preassure).
If we change total preassure of the system from [tex]p[/tex] to
[tex]p + \Delta p[/tex] we can use approximate formula to compute the change
in chemical potential of liquid phase (the chemical potential of vapour depends only on
partial preassure and temperature):
[tex] \mu_l(p + \Delta p,T)\approx \mu_l(p,T) + \upsilon_l \Delta p[/tex]
(partial derivative of chemical potential with respect to preassure at constant
temperature is molar volume [tex]\upsilon[/tex]).

So the following approximate equality for equillibrium holds:
[tex] \mu_l(p,T) + \upsilon_l \Delta p \approx \mu_g^0(T) + RT \log p_v(p+\Delta p)\approx<br /> \mu_g^0(T) + RT \log p_v(p) + \frac{RT}{p} \frac{d p_v}{dp} \Delta p[/tex]
As a result of the above equality and equillibrium condidtion at total preassure p we
had:
[tex] \frac{d p_v}{dp} \approx \frac{p \upsilon_l}{RT} [/tex]
So if we increase the total preassure, the saturated vapour preassure should also increase.
Have I made a mistake somewhere or my result is true. Is it obsereved in nature?
 
Science news on Phys.org
paweld said:
...I would like to compute the dependence of vapour saturated preassure on the total preassure of the system (vapour partial preassure + preassures of all
other gases).
So if we increase the total preassure, the saturated vapour preassure should also increase.
Have I made a mistake somewhere or my result is true. Is it obsereved in nature?
Result is true.
Start with a liquid of specific volume vl in equilbrium with its vapor of specific volume vv, at vapor pressure pv. Now add a little bit of "foreign" non-interacting gas of partial pressure pf.Suprisingly, the foreign gas will extract a liile bit of vapor out of the liquid. (not push some vapor back in).
Quick proof: (similar to yours, just abbrreviated)

d \mu_l= v_l dp
(p=pv+pf=total gas phase pressure=liquid pressure.)
d \mu_v= v_v dp_v
Equilibrium condition:
v_l dp =d \mu_l=d \mu_v= v_v dp_v
Therefore:
d p_v/dp = v_l/v_v
a small but positive number.
I don't know of experimental evidence but the effect is mentioned in the book "Thermal
Physics" by P.M. Morse. (chapter 9: Changes of Phase).
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K