Derivation for capacitance of cylindrical capacitor

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on the derivation of capacitance for a cylindrical capacitor, specifically the transition between steps in the derivation. Participants express confusion about how the radial electric field, denoted as E_r, is substituted in the derivation. The relevant expression for E_r is referenced from equation 23.8 in the textbook. Clarification is provided that this substitution pertains to the electric field outside a very long rod. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding this step in the overall derivation process.
member 731016
Homework Statement
Please see below
Relevant Equations
Please see below
I don't understand how they got from the previous step to the next step of the derivation circled in red:
1675053075013.png

Many thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
They replaced ##E_r## with the expression for the radial electric field for a very long rod in the region outside the rod. See equation 23.8 in the textbook that they quote.
 
  • Like
Likes member 731016
kuruman said:
They replaced ##E_r## with the expression for the radial electric field for a very long rod in the region outside the rod. See equation 23.8 in the textbook that they quote.
Thank you @kuruman !
 
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
545
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
3K