Derivation of angular acceleration

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around deriving the expression for angular acceleration, specifically \(\alpha=\frac{mgr}{I+mr^{2}}\), in the context of a mass \(m\) falling and causing a rotational effect. Participants are trying to understand the relationship between linear and angular motion in this scenario.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are questioning the clarity of the problem statement and the context in which the derivation is to be made. There are discussions about the nature of the motion (free-fall vs. rotational) and the setup involving a frictionless wheel and a string.

Discussion Status

The conversation is ongoing, with several participants expressing confusion about the problem's requirements and context. Some have suggested applying Newton's second law to both the wheel and the falling mass, while others are trying to visualize the setup and clarify the mechanics involved.

Contextual Notes

There is a lack of complete information regarding the specific setup of the experiment, including details about the wheel's role and the nature of the forces acting on the system. Participants are also noting the absence of numerical values in the problem statement.

nicolem10
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Derive the expression [tex]\alpha[/tex]=[tex]\frac{mgr}{I+mr^{2}}[/tex]for the acceleration a=[tex]\alpha[/tex]r of the falling mass m
I don't even know what this question is asking...
Any ideas on how to approach this wonderful little puzzle?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
anybody?
 
nicolem10 said:
Derive the expression [tex]\alpha[/tex]=[tex]\frac{mgr}{I+mr^{2}}[/tex]for the acceleration a=[tex]\alpha[/tex]r of the falling mass m
That's all the information given? I presume this is a mass in freefall, in which case the translational acceleration is g, but it would appear that it is rotating as well.
 
Last edited:
Unfortunately, yes. Can you figure out even which one is supposed to be derived or am I supposed to get one from the other? I'm really confused.
 
Please post the full problem! I can't believe that that's all you were given. There must be some context. You have the rotational inertia and mass of what? :wink:

Just by looking at the equation, I could make up a problem for which that would be the answer. But I'd rather see the actual problem.
 
Look at - http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/rotq.html#rq,

one sees that the definition of tangential acceleration is at = [itex]\alpha[/itex]r.

Now I am wonder if this problem is about a mass 'falling' in a circular arc, so it starts at a height of r, which gives a gravitational potential energy of mgr for a height of r above the bottom of the arc.

At the moment, that's all I can think of off the top of my head.
 
Last edited:
Here's one idea: An object (rotational inertia I) rotates freely about a horizontal axis through its center of mass. A mass m is attached such that it is a horizontal distance r from the axis. What's the acceleration of the "falling" mass?
 
OK I can clarify this much.

We did a lab. There was a frictionless wheel spinning in the horizontal plane. there was a string attached to the wheel and we timed different masses falling from a specified height.

The question involves no numbers, they just want us to derive the acceleration...

Sorry this is really stupid and I'm just not getting it.
 
nicolem10 said:
There was a frictionless wheel spinning in the horizontal plane. there was a string attached to the wheel and we timed different masses falling from a specified height.
That's better. Just apply Newton's 2nd law to both the wheel and the falling mass. Combine the resulting equations and you can solve for the acceleration. What forces act on each?
 
  • #10
We did a lab. There was a frictionless wheel spinning in the horizontal plane. there was a string attached to the wheel and we timed different masses falling from a specified height.
That's a vital piece of information! The wheel is spinning in the horizontal plane and the masses were falling, so presumably there is a frictionless (or nearl so) pulley over which the string is pulled?
 
  • #11
I suspect that the wheel is the pulley. They wound a string around the wheel, attached a mass, and let it drop.
 
  • #12
Doc Al said:
I suspect that the wheel is the pulley. They wound a string around the wheel, attached a mass, and let it drop.
I would have thought so if the wheel was spinning in the vertical plane, but the new information states the wheel is spinning horizontally, so I imagined the string to be traveling horizontally which would require another pulley somewhere if the string is tied to a falling mass. I was trying to visualize the geometry.
 
  • #13
Oops, you're right it does say "horizontal plane". I just assumed that he meant to write horizontal axis. But either way will work.
 
  • #14
Doc Al said:
Oops, you're right it does say "horizontal plane". I just assumed that he meant to write horizontal axis. But either way will work.
Yeah - it's the same thing, but it was a vital piece missing in the OP. The falling mass at r makes all the difference.
 

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
Replies
335
Views
17K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 71 ·
3
Replies
71
Views
5K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 97 ·
4
Replies
97
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
596