Derivation of electric potential due to point charge

Join the discussion
Registration is free. Start your own thread to ask a follow-up.
10 replies · 30K views
Sumedh
Messages
61
Reaction score
0
Electric potential is the work done in moving a unit charge from infinity to a point in an electric field.

Electric potential due to point charge:
[itex]V=-\int \vec{E}\cdot d\vec{s}[/itex]
[itex]V=-\int E\cdot ds cos \vartheta[/itex]
if the stationary charge is positive and
if the test charge is is moved from infinity to point P
then
[itex]V=-\int E\cdot ds cos 180[/itex]
[itex]V=-KQ \int \frac {1}{r^2} ds cos 180[/itex]

now how to solve further
as stationary charge is positive the electric field is outward i.e. from p to infinity
and movement of charge is from infinity to P
specially the signs and the direction of the field and the direction of ds
and definite integration from P to infinity or from infinity to P?
please give some imaginary picture or idea of how the test charge moves
I am confused with it please help.
 
Attachments
  • d.png
    d.png
    691 bytes · Views: 1,459
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
If the angle between E and ds is 180o, then, where in what direction is ds directed?
 
from infinity towards Q
now i have attached an image in the original post
 
Yes, but how do we call this direction? It has a "special relation" to one of the variables in your equations.
 
it should have relation with
[itex]\frac {1}{r^2}[/itex]
 
Yes. How do we call a straight line starting from a point a going to infinity?
 
i imagined that it may be a straight line i.e. the shortest distance between infinity and P
 
This straight line is called a ray, and the direction is called radial direction. On it, [itex]ds = dr[/itex]. You need to use this.
 
I am confused with the signs and directions of ds ,dr and test charge and also
how work done by external element is negative of work done by electric field.
 
I never understood, why integration in tensor calculus is obscured by some awkward notation. I guess, many textbook writers think, it's more intuitive to work with angles instead of vectors, but that's not true. To calculate a line integral, it's much more convenient to use the definition of that type of integral. Let [itex]\vec{V}(\vec{x})[/itex] be a vector field, defined in some domain of [itex]\mathbb{R}^3[/itex] and [itex]C: \lambda \in \mathbb{R} \supseteq (a,b) \mapsto \vec{x}(\lambda) \in \mathbb{R}^3[/itex] with values in the definition domain of [itex]\vec{V}[/itex]. Then the line integral over the vector field along the path [itex]C[/itex] is defined as

[tex]\int_C \mathrm{d} \vec{x} \cdot \vec{V}(\vec{x})=\int_{a}^{b} \mathrm{d} \lambda \frac{\mathrm{d} \vec{x}(\lambda)}{\mathrm{d} \lambda} \cdot \vec{V}[\vec{x}(\lambda)].[/tex]
 
The lines of forces are very simple in this case.
Fhsst_electrost25.png

Now you don't have to worry about the signs and angles here. Just simply use the formula for moving a charge through an electric field and you'll get it.
I hope this helps.
Thank you.