Derivation of Lorentz Transformation for Acceleration

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on deriving the Lorentz transformation for acceleration from the established Lorentz transformation equations for velocity. The key equations involved are the Lorentz transformations for position and time: \(x' = \gamma(x - vt)\) and \(t' = \gamma(t - \frac{vx}{c^2})\). The transformation for acceleration is derived by differentiating the velocity transformation \(u'_x = \frac{u_x - v}{1 - \frac{vu_x}{c^2}}\) with respect to time. The confusion arises from understanding the differentiation of \(dx'\) and \(dt'\) in relation to classical mechanics and calculus concepts.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Lorentz transformations in special relativity
  • Familiarity with calculus, particularly differentiation
  • Knowledge of classical mechanics concepts
  • Proficiency in using LaTeX for mathematical expressions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the Lorentz transformation equations in detail
  • Learn about total differentials and their applications in physics
  • Explore the implications of acceleration transformations in special relativity
  • Practice using LaTeX for writing complex mathematical expressions
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for physics students, educators, and anyone interested in the mathematical foundations of special relativity, particularly those focusing on acceleration transformations and their derivations.

MostlyHarmless
Messages
344
Reaction score
15

Homework Statement


Starting with the Lorentz transformation for the components of the velocity, derive the transformation for the components of acceleration.

Homework Equations


Lorentz Transformation for position and time :
##x'={\gamma}(x - vt)##
##t'={\gamma}(t - {\frac{vx}{c^2}})##
Resulting transformation by taking ##{\frac{dx'}{dt'}}##
##u'_x={\frac{u_x-v}{1-{\frac{vu_x}{c^2}}}}##

The Attempt at a Solution


Before I go through the trouble of typing out my attempt in LaTex (I'm on my phone), let me make sure I'm going at this right because I think I'm over thinking this and now its all twisted in my head.
Based on what they did to get the velocity transformation, I should be able to just take ##du'_x## and divide by the same ##dt'## used in the velocity transformation? Because it should be CHANGE of velocity over change in time. So ##{\frac{du'_x}{dt'}}## should give me what I want right?EDIT: I've refined my confusion.

Its about how they are getting dx' and dt'.
They are given as:
##dx'= {\gamma}(dx - vdt)##
##dt'={\gamma}(dt - {\frac{vdx}{c^2}})##

I'm not sure what they are differentiating with respect to so I don't know how to treat ##u'_x## as far as differentiation goes. I'm assuming(hoping) that my confusion is a result of the my notions of classical mechanics not being consistent here and not a result of losing my grip on Cal 1 stuff.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
It does seem that you are losing your grip on calculus. ##x'## and ##t'## are functions of ##x## and ##t##, so their total differentials will be linear forms of total differentials ##dx## and ##dt##.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K