Derivation of Maxwell equations.

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the derivation of the second Maxwell equation involving the dual field tensor from an action principle. The user expresses confusion about how this equation is typically constructed rather than derived, noting that textbooks often do not provide a clear derivation. They highlight that the dual tensor and the original tensor can be expressed in terms of each other, complicating the derivation process. The user also mentions the Jacobi identity, which arises from the antisymmetric nature of the tensor, suggesting that the relationship between the tensors is more of a property than a derivable equation. Ultimately, the discussion raises questions about the fundamental nature of these tensors and their independence in deriving Maxwell's equations.
arroy_0205
Messages
127
Reaction score
0
In source free case the Maxwell equation are
<br /> \partial_{\mu}F^{\mu \nu}=0;\,\,\partial_{\mu}\tilde{F}^{\mu \nu}=0<br />
I know how to derive the first equation from action principle. But how do I derive the second one containing dual field tensor form an action principle?It seems in the textbooks the second equation is "constructed" by observing the maxwell equation in terms of E amd B and the the field tensor, and not shown how to "derive" it form a basic principle. Can anybody tell me how to do that? Actually the dual tensor and the original tensor can be expressed in terms of each other, so one can say we can rewrite the action in terms of the dual tensor and then derive the equation. But that approach is also not independent of the original tensor. I am confused about which tensor is actually fundamental? Since these give different Maxwell equations, they should be independent. How to resolve this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I found out one fact, that the equation relating the dual tensor is actually not an equation but is an identity, called Jacobi identity and follows because of the antisymmetric nature of the tensor. It seems, thus the equation is a property of the antisym tensor itself and so probably not possible to derive from an action principle.
 

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
21K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K