Derivation of Rayleigh–Jeans law

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter jonathanpun
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Derivation Law
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
1 reply · 16K views
jonathanpun
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
I have read the derivation of the Rayleigh-Jeans law from:
http://www.cv.nrao.edu/course/astr534/BlackBodyRad.html

This derivation is quite similar to the derivation in my textbook.

My question is why the frequency/wavelength is quantized, but there still a d[itex]\nu[/itex] or d[itex]\lambda[/itex]. Not this "d" only apply to continuous variables?

And since the frequency is quantized, that means the emission spectrum is not continuous? But my textbook said "condensed state emits a continuous spectrum of radiation."
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's the energy which is quantized, not the frequency. You can have a photon of any frequency. But then E = n hω

(Derivations of this and other formulas often work in a large box of side L for convenience, to help with the normalization. In a box of side L the wavelength must be a submultiple of L. Afterwards, however, you let L -> ∞, and this restriction disappears.)