Derivation of Rocket Equation Using Relative Velocity

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the derivation of the rocket equation, specifically questioning the validity of a step involving relative velocity. The participant expresses confusion about the application of momentum conservation, particularly how the equation treats the mass of the system as variable. They argue that the derivation seems to overlook the implications of changing velocity, suggesting that the force equation should account for the non-constant nature of velocity. The critique highlights a perceived inconsistency in the treatment of mass and momentum in the derivation. Overall, the conversation seeks clarity on the underlying principles of the rocket equation and the assumptions made in its derivation.
lowea001
Messages
29
Reaction score
3
Based on my current understanding of the problem I do not see this following derivation as valid, although this is what was given in my course notes. Although this particular example is from an undergraduate physics course this is not a homework problem: I'm confused about the underlying concept. I will highlight below the specific step I do not understand. Here is the given derivation of the rocket equation:

A rocket of mass M_{0} (excluding fuel) originally has fuel of mass m_{0} which is being ejected at constant velocity u downward, relative to the rocket at a constant rate \frac{dm}{dt}. By conservation of momentum, the rocket acquires a velocity v upward. Applying momentum conservation in the frame of an observer we have:
\frac{d(M(t)v)}{dt} = M(t)\frac{dv}{dt} + v\frac{dM(t)}{dt} = (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt} ***the expression after the last equals sign is what I do not get. ***
Since dM=dm we have:
M(t)\frac{dv}{dt} = -\frac{dM(t)}{dt}u
which is the rocket equation.
Okay, so most of that makes sense (kind of), but the relative velocity part seems kind of questionable (or hand-wavy at the very least) since the entire premise behind being able to treat a fluid's change in momentum being only due to its rate of change of mass is that the velocity is constant, which it is clearly not in the case of v - u. In other words, why does the force from a fluid equation F = v\frac{dm}{dt} still work if v is not constant, but changing with time? Shouldn't the right hand side of the line in question read \frac{dm(v-u)}{dt} = \frac{dm}{dt}v + \frac{dv}{dt}m - \frac{dm}{dt}u since v isn't constant? Sorry, I tried to make this as succinct as possible. If someone could point me in the general direction and help me understand how I am misunderstanding this idea I would be very grateful. Thank you.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The first step, d(mv)/dt= mdv/dt+vdm/dt, is problematic. In effect, it treats the mass m(t) of a closed system as something that can vary. This is of course nonsense. Ending up with the right rocket equation appears to be via some sleight of hand, and I think it is that part that had you foxed.
 
  • Like
Likes lowea001

Similar threads

  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
2K
Replies
43
Views
4K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K